Apple Inc. v. Amazon.Com, Inc.

Filing 124

ORDER DISMISSING CASE, ***Civil Case Terminated. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 7/9/13. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/9/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 DAVID R. EBERHART (S.B. #195474) deberhart@omm.com DAVID J. SEPANIK (S.B. #221527) dsepanik@omm.com O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP Two Embarcadero Center, 28th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111-3823 Telephone: 415/984-8700 Facsimile: 415/984-8701 Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant APPLE INC. 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 MARTIN R. GLICK (No. 40187) email: martin.glick@aporter.com DANIEL B. ASIMOW (No. 165661) email: daniel.asimow@aporter.com SEAN M. CALLAGY (No. 255230) email: sean.callagy@aporter.com ARNOLD & PORTER LLP Three Embarcadero Center, 7th Floor San Francisco, California 94111-4024 Telephone: 415/434-1600 Facsimile: 415/677-6262 Attorneys for Defendants AMAZON.COM, INC., a Delaware corporation, and AMAZON DIGITAL SERVICES, INC., a Delaware corporation 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 18 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 19 20 APPLE INC., 21 22 23 24 No. 11-cv-01327 PJH Plaintiff, v. Action Filed: March 18, 2011 [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING ACTION AMAZON.COM, INC., et al., Defendants. 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING ACTION 11 1327 PJH 1 2 WHEREAS, Apple Inc. (“Apple”) sued Amazon.com and Amazon Digital Services, Inc. 3 (“Amazon”) on March 18, 2011 in Civil Action No. 11-cv-01327 PJH in the United States District 4 Court for the Northern District of California (“the Complaint”) claiming that Amazon’s use of 5 Appstore infringed Apple’s rights in App Store, and; 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 WHEREAS, Amazon filed an answer and counterclaim for declaratory relief of noninfringement on April 25, 2011 (“the Counterclaim”), and; WHEREAS, Apple issued to Amazon a covenant not to sue (“the Covenant”) on June 28, 2013, and wishes to have the Complaint dismissed with prejudice, and; WHEREAS, the Covenant issued by Apple to Amazon renders the Counterclaim moot and, therefore, Amazon wishes to have the Counterclaim dismissed without prejudice; THEREFORE, the parties request that the Court enter this Order accomplishing those dismissals. 14 15 DATED: July 8, 2013. 16 17 DAVID R. EBERHART DAVID J. SEPANIK O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP By: /s/ David R. Eberhart DAVID R. EBERHART 18 Attorneys for Plaintiff APPLE INC. 19 20 21 22 23 DATED: July 8, 2013. MARTIN R. GLICK DANIEL B. ASIMOW SEAN M. CALLAGY ARNOLD & PORTER LLP By: /s/ Martin R. Glick MARTIN R. GLICK 24 25 26 Attorneys for Defendants AMAZON.COM, INC., a Delaware corporation, and AMAZON DIGITAL SERVICES, INC., a Delaware corporation 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING ACTION -1- 11 1327 PJH 1 IT IS SO ORDERED. 2 3 9 DATED: July __, 2013. ERED R NIA O ORD IT IS S UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE n RT 8 H ER Hamilto 9 FO NO hyllis J. Judge P LI 7 UNIT ED 6 S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O S 5 A 4 N F D IS T IC T O R C 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING ACTION -2- 11 1327 PJH

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?