Apple Inc. v. Amazon.Com, Inc.
Filing
27
Proposed Order re 25 MOTION to Shorten Time TO HEAR MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING APPLE INC.'S MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME TO HEAR ITS MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION by Apple Inc.. (Eberhart, David) (Filed on 4/13/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
DAVID R. EBERHART (S.B. #195474)
deberhart@omm.com
RYAN J. PADDEN (S.B. #204515)
rpadden@omm.com
DAVID J. SEPANIK (S.B. #221527)
dsepanik@omm.com
O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP
Two Embarcadero Center, 28th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: (415) 984-8700
Facsimile: (415) 984-8701
Attorneys for Plaintiff
APPLE INC.
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
APPLE INC., a California corporation,
13
14
15
16
17
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. CV 11-01327 PJH
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
APPLE INC.’S MOTION TO SHORTEN
TIME TO HEAR ITS MOTION FOR
PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
AMAZON.COM, INC., a Delaware
corporation, and AMAZON DIGITAL
SERVICES, INC., a Delaware corporation,
Defendants.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION
TO SHORTEN TIME
CASE NO. CV 11-01327 PJH
1
Plaintiff Apple, Inc.’s (“Apple”) Motion to Shorten Time to Hear Motion for Preliminary
2
Injunction was filed on April 13, 2011. Having carefully considered the arguments and the
3
relevant legal authority, and good cause appearing, the Court hereby GRANTS Apple’s motion to
4
shorten time.
5
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
6
1. A hearing to consider the issuance of a preliminary injunction shall be held at
7
___:___ __.m., on ______, 2011, at United States District Court for the Northern
8
District of California, Oakland Courthouse, Courtroom 3, 3rd Floor, 1301 Clay
9
Street, Oakland, CA 94612.
10
11
Dated: _______________, 2011
12
13
By
The Honorable Phyllis J. Hamilton
United States District Court Judge
14
15
SF1:818825.1
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION
TO SHORTEN TIME
CASE NO. CV 11-01327 PJH
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?