Apple Inc. v. Amazon.Com, Inc.

Filing 27

Proposed Order re 25 MOTION to Shorten Time TO HEAR MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING APPLE INC.'S MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME TO HEAR ITS MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION by Apple Inc.. (Eberhart, David) (Filed on 4/13/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 DAVID R. EBERHART (S.B. #195474) deberhart@omm.com RYAN J. PADDEN (S.B. #204515) rpadden@omm.com DAVID J. SEPANIK (S.B. #221527) dsepanik@omm.com O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP Two Embarcadero Center, 28th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 984-8700 Facsimile: (415) 984-8701 Attorneys for Plaintiff APPLE INC. 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 APPLE INC., a California corporation, 13 14 15 16 17 Plaintiff, v. Case No. CV 11-01327 PJH [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING APPLE INC.’S MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME TO HEAR ITS MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AMAZON.COM, INC., a Delaware corporation, and AMAZON DIGITAL SERVICES, INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendants. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME CASE NO. CV 11-01327 PJH 1 Plaintiff Apple, Inc.’s (“Apple”) Motion to Shorten Time to Hear Motion for Preliminary 2 Injunction was filed on April 13, 2011. Having carefully considered the arguments and the 3 relevant legal authority, and good cause appearing, the Court hereby GRANTS Apple’s motion to 4 shorten time. 5 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 6 1. A hearing to consider the issuance of a preliminary injunction shall be held at 7 ___:___ __.m., on ______, 2011, at United States District Court for the Northern 8 District of California, Oakland Courthouse, Courtroom 3, 3rd Floor, 1301 Clay 9 Street, Oakland, CA 94612. 10 11 Dated: _______________, 2011 12 13 By The Honorable Phyllis J. Hamilton United States District Court Judge 14 15 SF1:818825.1 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME CASE NO. CV 11-01327 PJH

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?