Apple Inc. v. Amazon.Com, Inc.
Filing
32
Statement of Disclosure (Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 7.1) by Amazon Digital Services, Inc.. (Glick, Martin) (Filed on 4/18/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
MARTIN R. GLICK (No. 40187)
email: mglick@howardrice.com
CLARA J. SHIN (No. 214809)
email: cshin@howardrice.com
SARAH J. GIVAN (No. 238301)
email: sgivan@howardrice.com
HOWARD RICE NEMEROVSKI CANADY
FALK & RABKIN
A Professional Corporation
Three Embarcadero Center, 7th Floor
San Francisco, California 94111-4024
Telephone: 415/434-1600
Facsimile: 415/677-6262
Attorneys for Defendants
AMAZON.COM, INC., a Delaware
corporation, and AMAZON DIGITAL
SERVICES, INC., a Delaware corporation
10
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
14
APPLE INC., a California corporation,
15
16
17
18
19
Plaintiff,
v.
AMAZON.COM, INC., a Delaware
corporation, and AMAZON DIGITAL
SERVICES, INC., a Delaware corporation,
No. 11-cv-01327 PJH
Action Filed: March 18, 2011
DEFENDANT AMAZON DIGITAL
SERVICES, INC.’S DISCLOSURE
STATEMENT (FED. R. CIV. PROC. 7.1)
Defendants.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
AMAZON DIGITAL’S FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURE STMT
11-cv-01327 PJH
1
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“FRCP”) 7.1(a), the undersigned, counsel
2
of record for Defendant Amazon Digital Services, Inc., certifies that Amazon Digital
3
Services, Inc. is a wholly-owned subsidiary of parent company Amazon.com, Inc. No other
4
publicly held company owns more than 10% of Amazon Digital Services, Inc.’s stock.
5
6
DATED: April 18, 2011.
7
Respectfully,
8
MARTIN R. GLICK
CLARA J. SHIN
SARAH J. GIVAN
HOWARD RICE NEMEROVSKI CANADY
FALK & RABKIN
A Professional Corporation
9
10
11
12
13
14
By:
/s/ Martin R. Glick
MARTIN R. GLICK
Attorneys for Defendants AMAZON.COM, INC.,
a Delaware corporation, and AMAZON DIGITAL
SERVICES, INC., a Delaware corporation
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
AMAZON DIGITAL’S FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURE STMT
-1-
11-cv-01327 PJH
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?