Payne v. City & County of San Francisco et al

Filing 64

ORDER REQUIRING CONFERENCE REGARDING MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 2/14/2012. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/14/2012)

1
2
3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

5
6
7
8

DERRICK PAYNE,
Plaintiff,

9
10
11

Northern District of California

United States District Court

12

Case No.: 4:11-cv-01328-YGR
ORDER REQUIRING CONFERENCE
REGARDING MAGISTRATE JUDGE

v.
DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY ROWENA T.
LIANG, et al.,
Defendants.

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22

In the Joint Case Management Statement filed on January 30, 2012, the parties indicated their
“willing[ness] to consider additional magistrate judges depending on the judge that would be
assigned.” Dkt. No. 63. The Court orders that the parties meet and confer within fourteen (14) days
of the date this Order regarding whether they will consent to a United States Magistrate Judge for all
purposes, including trial. Within three (3) days thereafter, the parties shall jointly provide the Court
with their proposed Magistrate Judge (if agreed upon), or a list of three Magistrate Judges (per side)
indicating each party’s preference. If the parties do not consent to a Magistrate Judge for all purposes,
including trial, the parties shall so inform the Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

23
24

Dated: February 14, 2012

25

_________________________________________

26

YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

27
28