City of Oakland v. SSA Terminals, LLC et al
Filing
119
SIXTH STIPULATION AND ORDER FURTHER AMENDING TRIAL-RELATED DATES Discovery cutoff 2/22/2013. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 12/19/12. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/19/2012)
1
2
3
4
MICHELE HEFFES #160733
ACTING PORT ATTORNEY
DONNELL CHOY #85458
DEPUTY PORT ATTORNEY
PORT OF OAKLAND
530 Water Street, 4th Floor
Oakland, California 94607
Telephone: (510) 627-1346
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
RICHARD T. WHITE #58622
J. BRITTAIN HABEGGER #57192
FITZGERALD ABBOTT & BEARDSLEY LLP
1221 Broadway, 21st Floor
Oakland, California 94612
Telephone: (510) 451-3300
Facsimile: (510) 451-1527
Email: rwhite@fablaw.com; bhabegger@fablaw.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff City of Oakland,
A Municipal Corporation, Acting By and
Through Its Board of Port Commissioners
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
15
16
CITY OF OAKLAND, a Municipal
Corporation, Acting By and Through Its
Board of Port Commissioners
Plaintiff,
17
18
19
20
21
22
25
26
SIXTH STIPULATION FURTHER
AMENDING TRIAL-RELATED DATES
AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
vs.
SSA TERMINALS, LLC, SSA TERMINALS
(OAKLAND), LLC and DOES 1 through 50,
inclusive,
Defendant.
SSA TERMINALS, LLC; SSA TERMINALS
(OAKLAND), LLC,
Counterclaimants,
23
24
CASE NO.: C11-01446 YGR
vs.
CITY OF OAKLAND and Does 1 through 10,
Counter-Defendants.
27
28
1.
SIXTH STIPULATION FURTHER AMENDING TRIAL-RELATED DATES AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO.: C11-01446 YGR
12/19/12 (27492) #490962.2
1
After conference with the Court and counsel on December 17, 2012, Plaintiff and
2
Counter-Defendant City of Oakland, a Municipal Corporation, Acting By and Through its
3
Board of Port Commissioners (the “Port”), and Defendants and Counter-Claimants SSA
4
Terminals, LLC, and SSA Terminals (Oakland), LLC (“SSAT”), seek a fifth order
5
modifying the trial and pretrial scheduling dates in the Order Regarding Fourth Stipulation
6
Further Amending Trial-Related Dates dated October 29, 2012 (“Fourth Order,”
7
Document 111), and the Civil Minutes issued following a telephone conference between
8
the Court and counsel held on November 7, 2012 (“Minutes,” Document 112) as follows:
9
10
1.
The pre-trial and trial dates set forth in the Fourth Order (Document 111)
and Minutes (Document 112) are vacated.
11
2.
The following new dates apply:
12
(a)
the trial date will be set on not less than three weeks’ notice from
13
the Court on or after May 3, 2013, with Jury Selection to occur when the Court
14
designates;
15
(b)
close of all discovery on February 22, 2013;
16
(c)
the pretrial conference, exchange of exhibits, pretrial conference
17
18
motions and statements, and the filing of all trial documents be rescheduled as follows:
March 29 Exchange trial exhibits and Motions in Limine [MIL]
22
April 12
File Joint Pretrial Conference Statement
April 19
File opposition to MILs
21
Last day to meet and confer re Joint Pretrial Statement
20
April 5
19
April 26
File all trial documents [Proposed Order re Stipulations, Witness
Lists, Expert Witness Lists, Exhibit Lists, Discovery Excerpts, Jury
Instructions, Joint Statement of Case, Voir Dire List and Proposed
Verdict Forms]
23
24
25
26
///
///
27
28
2.
SIXTH STIPULATION FURTHER AMENDING TRIAL-RELATED DATES AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO.: C11-01446 YGR
12/19/12 (27492) #490962.2
1
May 3
Pre-Trial Conference
2
3
Dated: December _____, 2012
Respectfully,
FITZGERALD ABBOTT & BEARDSLEY LLP
4
5
By
Richard T. White
Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant
6
7
8
Dated: December _____, 2012
9
RUSSELL, MIRKOVICH & MORROW
By
Joseph N. Mirkovich
Attorneys for Defendants and Counterclaimants
SSA Terminals, LLC and SSA Terminals
(Oakland), LLC
10
11
12
13
ORDER
14
15
16
Pursuant to the above Stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED. This Order terminates Dkt.
Nos. 115 & 117.
17
18
Dated: December 19, 2012
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3.
SIXTH STIPULATION FURTHER AMENDING TRIAL-RELATED DATES AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO.: C11-01446 YGR
12/19/12 (27492) #490962.2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?