Sylvester v. County of Del Norte et al
Filing
59
ORDER re 56 Discovery Letter Brief filed by Taser International, Inc.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nandor J. Vadas on May 18, 2012. (njvlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/18/2012)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
6
No. C-11-01459 YGR (NJV)
SYLVESTER
7
Plaintiff(s),
8
ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT’S
LETTER BRIEF
v.
9
(Doc. No. 56)
COUNTY OF DEL NORTE, et al.,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
Defendant(s).
___________________________________/
12
Discovery matters in this action have been referred to the undersigned. The Court
13
understands that the parties met and conferred telephonically before Taser filed its letter brief. Doc.
14
No. 56. The Court orders counsel for plaintiff and for Taser to meet and confer again regarding the
15
specific issues raised in Taser’s letter brief.1 The meet and confer efforts should be completed on or
16
before May 25, 2012. Counsel for plaintiff may file a 5 page response to Taser’s letter brief by June
17
1, 2012, noting which issues have been resolved and addressing any open issues. The Court will
18
hear oral argument on June 12, 2012 at 2:00 p.m. Parties may choose to appear in Eureka in person,
19
by phone from their respective locations, or by video conference from San Francisco, and should
20
contact Judge Vadas’ courtroom deputy to finalize these details. Please note that the Court cannot
21
accommodate requests for using both video conference and phone appearances at the same hearing.
22
23
IT IS SO ORDERED.
24
25
Dated: May 18, 2012
26
Nandor J. Vadas
United States Magistrate Judge
27
28
1
The Court’s Standing Orders require parties to meet and confer in person before filing a
motion to compel. Given the geographic locations of the parties, however, the Court will allow the
parties to meet and confer telephonically instead. The Court may revisit the issue if telephonic meet and
confers are not productive.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?