Fister v. Astrue

Filing 22

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 21 .. Signed by Judge Laurel Beeler on 9/27/2011. (lblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/27/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 David J. Linden Attorney at Law CSBN 41221 Post Office Box 5780 Napa, CA 94581-0780 Tel. (707) 252-7007 Fax. (707) 252-7883 David@Lindenlaw.net 5 Attorney for Plaintiff 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 THOMAS E. FISTER, Plaintiff, 13 vs. 14 15 16 MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, 17 Defendant. ) Case No.: 4:11-cv-01461-LB ) ) STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER ) FOR EXTENSION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 18 19 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the undersigned for the respective parties, subject to 20 the approval of the Court, that Plaintiff shall have a 14-day extension of time, until Monday, 21 October 17, 2011, in which to file Plaintiff’s reply to Defendant’s Notice, Motion and 22 Memorandum in Support of Cross Motion for Summary Judgment and in Opposition to 23 Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment. This extension is requested because of the workload 24 of Plaintiff’s attorneys. 25 // Fister v. Astrue Stipulation and Order, 4:11-01461-LB Page 1 1 2 // Respectfully submitted, 3 Date: September 23, 2011 /s/ David J. Linden DAVID J. LINDEN Attorney for Plaintiff 4 5 6 MELINDA L. HAAG United States Attorney 7 8 9 Date: September 23, 2011 By /s/ Daniel P. Talbert [authorized via electronic mail on 09/23/2011] DANIEL P. TALBERT Special Assistant US Attorney 10 11 12 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff shall have until Monday, 13 October 17, 2011, to submit his response to Defendant’s Notice, Motion, and Memorandum in 14 Support of Cross Motion for Summary Judgment and in Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion for 15 Summary Judgment. 16 17 18 19 20 September 27, 2011 DATED: _______________ ________________________ LAUREL BEELER UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 21 22 23 24 25 Fister v. Astrue Stipulation and Order, 4:11-01461-LB Page 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?