Fister v. Astrue
Filing
22
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 21 .. Signed by Judge Laurel Beeler on 9/27/2011. (lblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/27/2011)
1
2
3
4
David J. Linden
Attorney at Law
CSBN 41221
Post Office Box 5780
Napa, CA 94581-0780
Tel. (707) 252-7007
Fax. (707) 252-7883
David@Lindenlaw.net
5
Attorney for Plaintiff
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
THOMAS E. FISTER,
Plaintiff,
13
vs.
14
15
16
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner
of Social Security,
17
Defendant.
) Case No.: 4:11-cv-01461-LB
)
) STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
) FOR EXTENSION
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
18
19
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the undersigned for the respective parties, subject to
20
the approval of the Court, that Plaintiff shall have a 14-day extension of time, until Monday,
21
October 17, 2011, in which to file Plaintiff’s reply to Defendant’s Notice, Motion and
22
Memorandum in Support of Cross Motion for Summary Judgment and in Opposition to
23
Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment. This extension is requested because of the workload
24
of Plaintiff’s attorneys.
25
//
Fister v. Astrue Stipulation and Order, 4:11-01461-LB
Page 1
1
2
//
Respectfully submitted,
3
Date: September 23, 2011
/s/ David J. Linden
DAVID J. LINDEN
Attorney for Plaintiff
4
5
6
MELINDA L. HAAG
United States Attorney
7
8
9
Date: September 23, 2011
By /s/ Daniel P. Talbert
[authorized via electronic mail on 09/23/2011]
DANIEL P. TALBERT
Special Assistant US Attorney
10
11
12
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff shall have until Monday,
13
October 17, 2011, to submit his response to Defendant’s Notice, Motion, and Memorandum in
14
Support of Cross Motion for Summary Judgment and in Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion for
15
Summary Judgment.
16
17
18
19
20
September 27, 2011
DATED: _______________
________________________
LAUREL BEELER
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
21
22
23
24
25
Fister v. Astrue Stipulation and Order, 4:11-01461-LB
Page 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?