O'Toole et al v. City of Antioch et al
Filing
18
ORDER striking 16 Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 6/22/2011. (hlk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/22/2011)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
6
7
SEAN O’TOOLE, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
8
9
v.
ORDER STRIKING AMENDED
COMPLAINT
10
CITY OF ANTIOCH, et al.,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
No. C 11-1502 PJH
12
Defendants.
_______________________________/
13
14
On June 21, 2011, plaintiffs filed an amended complaint without the opposing
15
parties’ written consent or leave of court pursuant to FRCP 15(a)(2). Because defendants
16
filed a motion to dismiss claims alleged in the complaint pursuant to FRCP 12(b)(6) on April
17
19, 2011, plaintiffs’ time to amend as of right within 21 days after service of that motion has
18
expired. FRCP 15(a)(1). The court therefore STRIKES the amended complaint as
19
improperly filed.
20
However, plaintiffs’ attempt to amend the complaint may suggest that plaintiffs are
21
aware of certain deficiencies in the original complaint. Accordingly, plaintiffs may file a
22
motion for leave to amend the complaint, or may enter into a stipulation with defendants
23
that plaintiffs can amend the complaint. As the original complaint remains the operative
24
complaint, defendants’ motion to dismiss remain on calendar for hearing on July 27, 2011.
25
If plaintiffs move to amend the complaint before defendants’ motion is heard, then
26
the court would find it in the interest of judicial economy to first address the grounds for
27
amendment, which may obviate the need to decide defendants’ motion. The parties
28
1
shall meet and confer within ten days and attempt to agree on an approach that will
2
streamline this process.
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
Dated: June 22, 2011
______________________________
PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON
United States District Judge
7
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?