O'Toole et al v. City of Antioch et al

Filing 229

ORDER of dismissal. Signed by Judge Hamilton on 10/2/2015. (pjhlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/2/2015)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES D
DISTRICT C
COURT

5

NORTHER DISTRIC OF CAL
N
RN
CT
LIFORNIA

6
7

SEAN O'TOO
OLE, et al.,
,

9
10

v.

ORDER O DISMISS
OF
SAL

CITY OF AN
C
NTIOCH, et al.,
Defendants.

11
United States District Court
Northern District of California

Case No. 11-cv-1502
2-PJH

Plaintiffs,

8

12
13
14

The pa
arties hereto by their counsel, ha
o,
c
aving advise the cour that they have
ed
rt

15

agreed to a se
ettlement of this case, IT IS HER
o
,
REBY ORDE
ERED that this case is dismissed
s
d

16

wit
thout preju
udice; provid
ded, howev that if any party he
ver
ereto shall c
certify to thi court,
is

17

wit
thin sixty da
ays, with pr
roof of service thereof on the opp
posing party that the a
y,
agreed

18

consideration for said se
ettlement ha not been delivered over, the fo
as
n
oregoing or
rder shall

19

sta vacated and this case shall fo
and
d
c
orthwith be restored to the calend to be se for trial.
o
dar
et

20

If no ce
ertification is filed, afte passage of sixty day the dism
i
er
ys,
missal shall be with

21

pre
ejudice. Th parties may, of cour
he
m
rse, substit ute a dismi
issal with p
prejudice at any time
t

22

during this six day period.
xty

23
24
25
26
27
28

The Oc
ctober 8, 20 pretrial conferenc e and the N
015
November 2 2015 tria date are
2,
al
VA
ACATED.
IT IS SO ORDER
S
RED.
Da
ated: Octob 2, 2015
ber
__
__________
__________
__________
_______
PH
HYLLIS J. H
HAMILTON
Un
nited States District Ju
s
udge