Hinson v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company

Filing 29

ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S LETTER FOR LEAVE TO FILE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 6/4/12. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/4/2012)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 1 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 2 3 4 5 FLOYD HINSON, 6 Plaintiff, 7 vs. Case No.: C-11-01522-YGR ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT’S LETTER FOR LEAVE TO FILE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 8 9 10 METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. 11 Northern District of California United States District Court 12 On June 1, 2012, Plaintiff filed a late response to Defendant’s letter requesting a pre-summary 13 judgment motion conference. (Dkt. Nos. 25–27.) Plaintiff’s letter fails to respond to the grounds 14 identified by Defendant for filing a summary judgment motion. Rather, Plaintiff suggests ways to 15 streamline proceedings and states an intent to file a cross-motion, without identifying the grounds for 16 that motion. 17 Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to provide a supplemental response to Defendant’s May 25, 2012 18 letter, specifically addressing the substantive issues raised therein, no later than Wednesday, June 6, 19 2012. Plaintiff must also outline the basis of any cross-motion that he intends to bring. If Plaintiff 20 fails to file a supplemental response as set forth above, the Court will vacate the conference scheduled 21 for June 8, 2012 and grant Defendant leave to file its summary judgment motion. 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: June 4, 2012 ________________________________________ YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?