Balanced Body, Inc. v. Teague Pilates, Inc

Filing 15

ORDER Granting 14 Stipulation Extending Time to File Responsive Pleading. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 4/29/2011. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/29/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 LOIS A. LINDSTROM, Bar No: 111743 FATEH K. SAHOTA, Bar No: 240220 ERICKSEN ARBUTHNOT. 155 Grand Avenue, Ste. 1050 Oakland, California 94612 Tele: (510) 832-7770 Fax: (510) 832-0102 Attorneys for Defendant TEAGUE PILATES, INC. 6 7 8 9 10 PATRICK McCARTHY, Bar No: 108079 LAW OFFICES OF PATRIC McCARTHY 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160 Pleasanton, CA 94566 Tele: (925) 460-6000 Fax: (925) 460-6292 Attorney for Plaintiff BALANCED BODY, INC. 11 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFRONIA 14 15 Case No.: C11-01528 PSG CW BALANCED BODY, INC. 16 STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING Plaintiff, 17 vs. 18 19 TEAGUE PILATES, INC., and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, 20 Defendant. 21 22 23 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the parties hereto, by 24 their respective counsel, that defendant TEAGUE PILATES, INC. may have to and including 25 May 16, 2011 to file its responsive pleading to plaintiff’s complaint filed on March 30, 2011. 26 // 27 // 28 // -1BALANCED BODY, INC. V. TEAGUE No. C11 01528 Stipulation Extending Time to File Responsive Pleading 1 Dated: April 27, 2011 Dated: April 27, 2011 2 LAW OFFICES OF PATRICK McCARTHY ERICKSEN ARBUTHNOT /s/ Patrick McCarthy _______________________________ PATRICK McCARTHY Attorney for Plaintiff BALANCED BODY, INC. /s/ Fateh K. Sahota ________________________________ LOIS A. LINDSTROM FATEH K. SAHOTA Attorneys for Defendant TEAGUE PILATES, INC. 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 IT IS SO ORDERED. 12 13 14 April 29 Dated: _____________, 2011 _________________________________ HONORABLE CLAUDIA WILKEN 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2BALANCED BODY, INC. V. TEAGUE No. C11 01528 Stipulation Extending Time to File Responsive Pleading

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?