Balanced Body, Inc. v. Teague Pilates, Inc
Filing
15
ORDER Granting 14 Stipulation Extending Time to File Responsive Pleading. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 4/29/2011. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/29/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
LOIS A. LINDSTROM, Bar No: 111743
FATEH K. SAHOTA, Bar No: 240220
ERICKSEN ARBUTHNOT.
155 Grand Avenue, Ste. 1050
Oakland, California 94612
Tele: (510) 832-7770
Fax: (510) 832-0102
Attorneys for Defendant
TEAGUE PILATES, INC.
6
7
8
9
10
PATRICK McCARTHY, Bar No: 108079
LAW OFFICES OF PATRIC McCARTHY
7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160
Pleasanton, CA 94566
Tele: (925) 460-6000
Fax: (925) 460-6292
Attorney for Plaintiff
BALANCED BODY, INC.
11
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFRONIA
14
15
Case No.: C11-01528 PSG CW
BALANCED BODY, INC.
16
STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR
DEFENDANT TO FILE RESPONSIVE
PLEADING
Plaintiff,
17
vs.
18
19
TEAGUE PILATES, INC., and DOES 1
through 20, inclusive,
20
Defendant.
21
22
23
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the parties hereto, by
24
their respective counsel, that defendant TEAGUE PILATES, INC. may have to and including
25
May 16, 2011 to file its responsive pleading to plaintiff’s complaint filed on March 30, 2011.
26
//
27
//
28
//
-1BALANCED BODY, INC. V. TEAGUE No. C11 01528
Stipulation Extending Time to File Responsive Pleading
1
Dated: April 27, 2011
Dated: April 27, 2011
2
LAW OFFICES OF PATRICK McCARTHY
ERICKSEN ARBUTHNOT
/s/ Patrick McCarthy
_______________________________
PATRICK McCARTHY
Attorney for Plaintiff
BALANCED BODY, INC.
/s/ Fateh K. Sahota
________________________________
LOIS A. LINDSTROM
FATEH K. SAHOTA
Attorneys for Defendant
TEAGUE PILATES, INC.
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
IT IS SO ORDERED.
12
13
14
April 29
Dated: _____________, 2011
_________________________________
HONORABLE CLAUDIA WILKEN
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2BALANCED BODY, INC. V. TEAGUE No. C11 01528
Stipulation Extending Time to File Responsive Pleading
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?