Kelora Systems, LLC v. Target Corporation et al
Filing
162
ORDER TO RESPOND TO INTENT TO RELATE CASES. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 4/5/2011. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/5/2011) *** DISREGARD, THIS IS A DUPLICATE FILING. SEE ORIGINAL ORDER, DOCKET NO. 161 ***
Kelora Systems, LLC v. Target Corporation et al
Doc. 162
1 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3 4 EBAY INC. and MICROSOFT CORPORATION, 5 Plaintiffs, 6 v. 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 On April 1, 2011, Kelora Systems, LLC v. Target Corporation, Case No. C 11-1548 HRL, was transferred into this district from the Western District of Wisconsin. Kelora involves claims of PARTSRIVER, INC., and KELORA SYSTEMS, LLC, Defendants. / ORDER TO RESPOND TO INTENT TO RELATE CASES No. C 10-4947 CW
infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,275,821, which is at issue in this case. The similarities between the cases suggest that Civ. L.R.
relating Kelora to Case No. C 10-4947 CW is appropriate. 3-12.
Within four days of the date of this Order, the parties may file any response in opposition to or in support of relating Case No. C 11-1548 HRL to Case No. C 10-1497 CW and assigning it to the undersigned, the judge assigned to the earliest-filed case. If no
response is received, the case will be deemed related and the Clerk will be directed to re-assign it. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 4/5/2011 CLAUDIA WILKEN United States District Judge
Dockets.Justia.com
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?