Schipper v. Cisco Systems, Inc. et al

Filing 44

ORDER STAYING the Obligation for Defendants to Answer/Respond to Complaint, Parties' Initial Disclosure Obligations, and the Case Management Report and Schedule Pending Court's Selection of Lead Plaintiff/Counsel and Resolution of Defendants' Anticipated Motion to Dismiss re 13 Stipulation. Signed by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong, on 5/31/11. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/1/2011) Modified on 6/2/2011 (jlm, COURT STAFF).

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

3

OAKLAND DIVISION

4
5

HARRY SCHIPPER, Individually and on
Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated,

6
7
8
9

Plaintiff,
v.
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., JOHN T.
CHAMBERS, FRANK CALDERONI,
ROBERT LLOYD, and PHIL SMITH,

101 California Street
San Francisco, CA 94111-5802

Winston & Strawn LLP

10
Defendants.

11

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 4:11-cv-01568-SBA

[PROPOSED] ORDER
Dkt. 13

12
13
14
15

Pursuant to the Stipulation submitted by Plaintiff and Defendant, good cause having been
shown, the Court enters the following order:

16

1. Defendants’ obligation to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint filed in this

17

matter is stayed pending the Court’s selection of lead plaintiff and lead counsel and the filing of an

18

amended consolidated complaint.

19

2. The parties’ initial disclosure obligations pursuant to Rule 26(a) of the Federal Rules of

20

Civil Procedure are stayed pending the Court’s resolution of Defendant’s anticipated motion to

21

dismiss the amended consolidated complaint.

22

3. The currently scheduled deadlines for the submission of a case management report and

23

initial case management conference, June 30, 2011 and July 7, 2011, are stayed pending the Court’s

24

resolution of Defendant’s anticipated motion to dismiss.

25

4. The parties shall agree on a schedule for the filing of an amended consolidated complaint

26

and briefing Defendant’s motion to dismiss following the Court’s selection and appointment of a

27
28
-1STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT
CASE NO. 4:11-CV-01568-SBA
SF:307975.1

1

lead plaintiff and lead counsel for the putative class. If the parties cannot agree on a schedule, the

2

Court shall do so following a motion by either party.

3
4

5. This order shall apply to any and all putative securities class actions assigned to this Court
as a related-case pursuant to Local Rules 3-12 and 7-11.

5
6

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

7
8

Dated: May 31, 2011

__________________________________
SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG
United States District Judge

9

101 California Street
San Francisco, CA 94111-5802

Winston & Strawn LLP

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT
CASE NO. 4:11-CV-01568-SBA
SF:307975.1