Schipper v. Cisco Systems, Inc. et al

Filing 46

ORDER re 37 MOTION to Consolidate Cases MOTION to Appoint Lead Plaintiff and Lead Counsel ; Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof filed by New England Teamsters & Trucking Industry Pension Fund, The Council of the Borough o f South Tyneside Acting in Its Capacity as the Administering Authority of the Tyne and Wear Pension Fund, 45 Amended MOTION to Consolidate Cases filed by New England Teamsters & Trucking Industry Pension Fund, The Council of the Borough of South Ty neside Acting in Its Capacity as the Administering Authority of the Tyne and Wear Pension Fund, 30 MOTION to Consolidate Cases, Appointment of Lead Plaintiff, and Approval of Selection of Counsel filed by The Institutional Investor Group. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 6/3/11. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/3/2011)

1
2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

3

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

4

OAKLAND DIVISION

5

HARRY SCHIPPER, Individually and on

Case No: C 11-01568 SBA

6 Behalf of all Others Similarly Situated,

Plaintiff,

7
8

ORDER REVISING BRIEFING
SCHEDULE

vs.

9 CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., JOHN T.

CHAMBERS, FRANK CALDERONI,
10 ROBERT LLOYD and PHIL SMITH,

Defendants.

11
12
13

Various motions have been noticed for hearing on September 27, 2011. Dkt. 30, 37,

14

45. To expedite matters, the Court revises the briefing schedule specified in Civil Local Rule

15

7-3 as follows:

16

1.

Any opposition to the above-referenced motions shall be filed by no than three

17

(3) weeks from the date this order is filed. Opposition briefs are limited to fifteen (15) pages.

18

The failure to timely file an opposition may be construed as a consent to the granting of

19

the motion.

20
21
22

2.

Any reply shall be filed by no later than one (1) week after the opposition is

filed. Reply briefs are limited to ten (10) pages.
3.

The Court, in its discretion, may decide the motions without oral argument,

23

pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78(b) and Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), in which case

24

no appearance for the motion or Case Management Conference will be necessary. The parties

25

are advised to check the Court’s website to determine whether a court appearance is required.

26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: June 3, 2011

_______________________________
SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG
United States District Judge