Schipper v. Cisco Systems, Inc. et al
Filing
94
STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 4/29/13. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/29/2013)
1 ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN
& DOWD LLP
2 CHRISTOPHER P. SEEFER (201197)
Post Montgomery Center
3 One Montgomery Street, Suite 1800
San Francisco, CA 94104
4 Telephone: 415/288-4545
415/288-4534 (fax)
5 chriss@rgrdlaw.com
– and –
6 SAMUEL H. RUDMAN
58 South Service Road, Suite 200
7 Melville, NY 11747
Telephone: 631/367-7100
8 631/367-1173 (fax)
srudman@rgrdlaw.com
9
Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs
10
[Additional counsel appear on signature page.]
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
OAKLAND DIVISION
14
In re CISCO SYSTEMS INC. SECURITIES ) Lead Case No. C 11-1568-SBA
)
15 LITIGATION
) CLASS ACTION
)
16
) JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER
This Document Relates To:
) DISMISSING FIRST AMENDED
17
) COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE
ALL ACTIONS.
)
18
)
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
835693_1
1
Plaintiffs and defendants, by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby agree and
2 stipulate as follows:
3
WHEREAS, the Court entered an order dismissing the First Amended Complaint without
4 prejudice on April 5, 2013 (Dkt. No. 88);
5
WHEREAS, the Court provided plaintiffs the opportunity to file a Second Amended
6 Complaint on or before April 26, 2013 (id. at 27);
7
WHEREAS, the parties, having met and conferred, and agreed and stipulated that plaintiffs
8 will not file a Second Amended Complaint, will not appeal any prior judgments by this Court,
9 including the Court’s order dismissing the First Amended Complaint and that the First Amended
10 Complaint should be dismissed with prejudice; and
11
WHEREAS, plaintiffs and defendants further agree and stipulate that each party shall bear its
12 own costs in connection with this case;
13
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereby stipulate and agree, subject to this Court’s approval,
14 as follows:
15
1.
Plaintiffs will not appeal any prior judgments by this Court, including the Court’s
16 order dismissing the First Amended Complaint;
17
2.
The First Amended Complaint is dismissed with prejudice;
18
3.
Plaintiffs and defendants will each bear their own costs; and
19
4.
The case is hereby closed and all scheduled dates are struck from the Court’s
20 calendar.
21
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
22 DATED: April 26, 2013
23
ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN
& DOWD LLP
CHRISTOPHER P. SEEFER
24
25
s/ Christopher P. Seefer
CHRISTOPHER P. SEEFER
26
27
28
835693_1
-1-
1
Post Montgomery Center
One Montgomery Street, Suite 1800
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: 415/288-4545
415/288-4534 (fax)
2
3
4
ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN
& DOWD LLP
SAMUEL H. RUDMAN
58 South Service Road, Suite 200
Melville, NY 11747
Telephone: 631/367-7100
631/367-1173 (fax)
5
6
7
8
ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN
& DOWD LLP
MAUREEN E. MUELLER
655 West Broadway, Suite 1900
San Diego, CA 92101
Telephone: 619/231-1058
619/231-7423 (fax)
9
10
11
12
Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs
13
DATED: April 26, 2013
14
WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
J. ERIK CONNOLLY
15
16
s/ J. Erik Connolly
J. ERIK CONNOLLY
17
18
19
20
21
35 West Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60601
Telephone: 312/558-5600
312/558-5700 (fax)
Counsel for Defendants CISCO SYSTEMS,
INC., JOHN T. CHAMBERS and FRANK
CALDERONI
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
835693_1
-2-
1
I, Christopher P. Seefer, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this
2 Joint Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Dismissing with Prejudice the First Amended Complaint. In
3 compliance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3). I hereby attest that J. Erik Connolly has concurred in
4 this filing.
5
6
s/ Christopher P. Seefer
CHRISTOPHER P. SEEFER
7
8
9
10
*
11
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
*
ORDER
12
13
*
Based on the above Stipulation of the parties, by and through their counsel of record, and for
good cause showing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED:
1.
Plaintiffs will not appeal any prior judgments by this Court, including the Court’s
order dismissing the First Amended Complaint;
2.
The First Amended Complaint is dismissed with prejudice;
3.
Plaintiffs and defendants will each bear their own costs; and
4.
The case is hereby closed and all scheduled dates are struck from the Court’s
calendar.
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
22
23
24
DATED: 4/29/13
_________________________________________
HON. SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
25
26
27
28
835693_1
-3-
1
2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that on April 26, 2013, I authorized the electronic filing of the foregoing with
3 the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to the
4 e-mail addresses denoted on the attached Electronic Mail Notice List, and I hereby certify that I
5 caused to be mailed the foregoing document or paper via the United States Postal Service to the non6 CM/ECF participants indicated on the attached Manual Notice List.
7
I certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the
8 foregoing is true and correct. Executed on April 26, 2013.
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
s/ Christopher P. Seefer
CHRISTOPHER P. SEEFER
ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN
& DOWD LLP
Post Montgomery Center
One Montgomery Street, Suite 1800
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: 415/288-4545
415/288-4534 (fax)
E-mail:chriss@rgrdlaw.com
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
835693_1
-4-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?