Schipper v. Cisco Systems, Inc. et al

Filing 94

STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 4/29/13. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/29/2013)

Download PDF
1 ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN & DOWD LLP 2 CHRISTOPHER P. SEEFER (201197) Post Montgomery Center 3 One Montgomery Street, Suite 1800 San Francisco, CA 94104 4 Telephone: 415/288-4545 415/288-4534 (fax) 5 chriss@rgrdlaw.com – and – 6 SAMUEL H. RUDMAN 58 South Service Road, Suite 200 7 Melville, NY 11747 Telephone: 631/367-7100 8 631/367-1173 (fax) srudman@rgrdlaw.com 9 Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs 10 [Additional counsel appear on signature page.] 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 OAKLAND DIVISION 14 In re CISCO SYSTEMS INC. SECURITIES ) Lead Case No. C 11-1568-SBA ) 15 LITIGATION ) CLASS ACTION ) 16 ) JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER This Document Relates To: ) DISMISSING FIRST AMENDED 17 ) COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE ALL ACTIONS. ) 18 ) 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 835693_1 1 Plaintiffs and defendants, by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby agree and 2 stipulate as follows: 3 WHEREAS, the Court entered an order dismissing the First Amended Complaint without 4 prejudice on April 5, 2013 (Dkt. No. 88); 5 WHEREAS, the Court provided plaintiffs the opportunity to file a Second Amended 6 Complaint on or before April 26, 2013 (id. at 27); 7 WHEREAS, the parties, having met and conferred, and agreed and stipulated that plaintiffs 8 will not file a Second Amended Complaint, will not appeal any prior judgments by this Court, 9 including the Court’s order dismissing the First Amended Complaint and that the First Amended 10 Complaint should be dismissed with prejudice; and 11 WHEREAS, plaintiffs and defendants further agree and stipulate that each party shall bear its 12 own costs in connection with this case; 13 NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereby stipulate and agree, subject to this Court’s approval, 14 as follows: 15 1. Plaintiffs will not appeal any prior judgments by this Court, including the Court’s 16 order dismissing the First Amended Complaint; 17 2. The First Amended Complaint is dismissed with prejudice; 18 3. Plaintiffs and defendants will each bear their own costs; and 19 4. The case is hereby closed and all scheduled dates are struck from the Court’s 20 calendar. 21 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 22 DATED: April 26, 2013 23 ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN & DOWD LLP CHRISTOPHER P. SEEFER 24 25 s/ Christopher P. Seefer CHRISTOPHER P. SEEFER 26 27 28 835693_1 -1- 1 Post Montgomery Center One Montgomery Street, Suite 1800 San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: 415/288-4545 415/288-4534 (fax) 2 3 4 ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN & DOWD LLP SAMUEL H. RUDMAN 58 South Service Road, Suite 200 Melville, NY 11747 Telephone: 631/367-7100 631/367-1173 (fax) 5 6 7 8 ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN & DOWD LLP MAUREEN E. MUELLER 655 West Broadway, Suite 1900 San Diego, CA 92101 Telephone: 619/231-1058 619/231-7423 (fax) 9 10 11 12 Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs 13 DATED: April 26, 2013 14 WINSTON & STRAWN LLP J. ERIK CONNOLLY 15 16 s/ J. Erik Connolly J. ERIK CONNOLLY 17 18 19 20 21 35 West Wacker Drive Chicago, IL 60601 Telephone: 312/558-5600 312/558-5700 (fax) Counsel for Defendants CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., JOHN T. CHAMBERS and FRANK CALDERONI 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 835693_1 -2- 1 I, Christopher P. Seefer, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this 2 Joint Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Dismissing with Prejudice the First Amended Complaint. In 3 compliance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3). I hereby attest that J. Erik Connolly has concurred in 4 this filing. 5 6 s/ Christopher P. Seefer CHRISTOPHER P. SEEFER 7 8 9 10 * 11 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 * ORDER 12 13 * Based on the above Stipulation of the parties, by and through their counsel of record, and for good cause showing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: 1. Plaintiffs will not appeal any prior judgments by this Court, including the Court’s order dismissing the First Amended Complaint; 2. The First Amended Complaint is dismissed with prejudice; 3. Plaintiffs and defendants will each bear their own costs; and 4. The case is hereby closed and all scheduled dates are struck from the Court’s calendar. PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 23 24 DATED: 4/29/13 _________________________________________ HON. SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 25 26 27 28 835693_1 -3- 1 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on April 26, 2013, I authorized the electronic filing of the foregoing with 3 the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to the 4 e-mail addresses denoted on the attached Electronic Mail Notice List, and I hereby certify that I 5 caused to be mailed the foregoing document or paper via the United States Postal Service to the non6 CM/ECF participants indicated on the attached Manual Notice List. 7 I certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the 8 foregoing is true and correct. Executed on April 26, 2013. 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 s/ Christopher P. Seefer CHRISTOPHER P. SEEFER ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN & DOWD LLP Post Montgomery Center One Montgomery Street, Suite 1800 San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: 415/288-4545 415/288-4534 (fax) E-mail:chriss@rgrdlaw.com 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 835693_1 -4-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?