Schipper v. Cisco Systems, Inc. et al

Filing 96

ORDER by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong DENYING 95 MOTION TO INTERVENE. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/5/2014)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7

OAKLAND DIVISION

8

In re CISCO SYSTEMS INC. SECURITIES

Case No: C 11-1568 SBA

9 LITIGATION

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO
INTERVENE

10

This Document Relates To All Actions.
Dkt. 95

11
12
13
14

On April 29, 2013, the Court dismissed the action with prejudice upon the

15

stipulation of the parties. Dkt. 94. On May 27, 2014, five individuals, acting pro se, filed a

16

joint motion to intervene under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 24. Dkt. 95. Since this

17

case is closed and has been dismissed with prejudice, putative interveners’ motion is

18

DENIED AS MOOT.

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 30, 2014

______________________________
SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG
United States District Judge