Hollins v. United States of America et al

Filing 5

ORDER FOR PETITIONER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY PETITION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED AS MOOT. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 11/10/11. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/10/2011)

1
2
3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

5

OAKLAND DIVISION

6
7

MICHAEL HOLLINS,
Petitioner,

8
9

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

No. C 11-1601 PJH (PR)

vs.

ORDER FOR PETITIONER TO
SHOW CAUSE WHY
PETITION SHOULD NOT BE
DISMISSED AS MOOT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and
UNITED STATES MARSHALS
SERVICE,
Respondents.

12

/
13
14

This is a habeas case filed pro se by a state prisoner. At the time the petition was

15

filed, petitioner was held in the Alameda County Jail in anticipation of a hearing on

16

revocation of his federal supervised release. In the petition he asks that the court order

17

that his hearing be held immediately, or that he be released from supervision. He

18

subsequently admitted the revocation charges and supervised release was revoked. See

19

United States v. Hollins, 92-cr-00126-SBA (Order June 16, 2011). It thus appears that this

20

petition is moot.

21

Within fifteen days of the date this order is entered, petitioner shall show cause why

22

this petition should not be dismissed as moot. If he does not respond, or if he is unable to

23

show that the petition is not moot, the case will be dismissed.

24

IT IS SO ORDERED.

25

Dated: November 10 2011.
PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON
United States District Judge

26
27
28
P:\PRO-SE\PJH\HC.11\HOLLINS1601.OSC-P.wpd