Silverman v. The City and County of San Francisco et al

Filing 124

ORDER, Motions terminated: 120 MOTION to Continue Dispositive Motion Hearing Date; Require Service of Plaintiff's Motions, and Set A Case Management Conference filed by Juan P. Muniz, M. Marquez, Kenya Crawford, Kenneth Chin, Julio Gotchez, The City and County of San Francisco, David Basconcillo, Bernardo Bienvenidos, Vien Lam, Ian Ysip, Matthew Wong, Christopher Krol, Yuen, Paul Timpano, Seth Riskin, John Garcia, 123 MOTION to Continue filed by Jacob Silverman. Motions due by 8/20/2013. Case Management Conference set for 7/10/2013 03:15 PM.. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 6/10/13. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/10/2013)

1
2
3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

5

OAKLAND DIVISION

6
7
8

JACOB SILVERMAN,
Plaintiff,

9
10

vs.

Case No: C 11-1615 SBA
ORDER
Docket 120, 123

THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN

11 FRANCISCO et. al.,
12

Defendants.

13
14

The parties are presently before the Court on Defendants The City and County of

15

San Francisco and various law enforcement officers' (collectively, "Defendants")

16

administrative motion to continue the dispositive motion deadline by two months, to

17

require service of Plaintiff's motions,1 and to set a case management conference. Dkt. 120.

18

Also before the Court is Plaintiff Jacob Silverman's ("Plaintiff") motion for a 45-60 day

19

continuance. Dkt. 123. Having read and considered the papers filed in connection with

20

these matters and being fully informed, the Court hereby finds that good cause exists to

21

grant a continuance of the dispositive motion deadline and the deadlines for expert

22

designation and discovery, and to schedule a case management conference.

23

Accordingly,

24

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

25
26

1

In response to Defendants' request to meet and confer, Plaintiff sent a letter to
Defendants, which states that he "formulated two separate motions" that he forwarded to
27 the Court. Dkt. 120. Defendants request that the Court require Plaintiff to serve them with
these motions. However, because Plaintiff's motions to continue and to appoint counsel
28 were electronically filed on May 29, 2013, this request is MOOT. Dkt. 122, 123.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23

1.

The dispositive motion deadline is continued. All dispositive motions shall

be heard on or before August 20, 2013 at 1:00 p.m. The parties must meet and confer prior
to filing any motion. The movant shall certify to the Court in its moving papers that it has
complied with this requirement. Should the parties fail to meet and confer, the Court may
decline to entertain the motion.
2.

The expert designation and discovery deadlines are continued. Plaintiff shall

designate any experts by July 26, 2013; Defendants by July 26, 2013; rebuttal disclosure by
August 9, 2013. Any expert not so named may be disallowed as a witness. No expert will
be permitted to testify to any opinion, or basis or support for an opinion, that has not been
disclosed in response to an appropriate question or interrogatory from the opposing party.
Expert discovery shall be completed by August 30, 2013.
3.

All parties are ordered to participate in a mandatory settlement conference

during the following time period: August 21, 2013 to September 16, 2013 before
Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley.
4.

All other scheduled deadlines set forth in the Court's Amended Case

Management Scheduling Order (Dkt. 111) remain in effect.
5.

A Case Management Conference is scheduled for July 10, 2013 at 3:15 p.m.

Prior to the date scheduled for the conference, the parties shall meet and confer and prepare
a joint Case Management Conference Statement. Plaintiff is responsible for filing the joint
statement no less than seven (7) days prior to the conference date. The joint statement shall
comply with the Standing Order for All Judges of the Northern District of California and
the Standing Orders of this Court. Plaintiff is responsible for setting up the conference call,
and on the specified date and time, shall call [phone] with all parties on the line.

24
25
26
27

6.

This Order terminates Docket 120, 123.

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: 6/10/13

______________________________
SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG
United States District Judge

28
-2-