Silverman v. The City and County of San Francisco et al
Filing
129
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Show Cause Response due by 7/25/2013.. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 7/11/13. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/11/2013)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
OAKLAND DIVISION
7
8
9
JACOB SILVERMAN,
Plaintiff,
10
11
Case No: C 11-1615 SBA
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
RE DISMISSAL
vs.
THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN
12 FRANCISCO et. al.,
13
Defendants.
14
15
This Court previously scheduled a telephonic Case Management Conference for July
16
10, 2013, and ordered Plaintiff to file a Joint Case Management Conference Statement no
17
less than seven days in advance of the conference. Dkt. 124. Plaintiff failed to file the joint
18
statement as ordered, and failed to set up the conference call for the Case Management
19
Conference and contact the Court at the scheduled date and time. The failure to comply
20
with a Court order is grounds for dismissal of this action under Federal Rule of Civil
21
Procedure 41(b).1 See Ferdick v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1260 (9th Cir. 1992).
22
Accordingly,
23
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Plaintiff shall show cause why the instant action
24
should not be dismissed without prejudice under Rule 41(b) for failure to comply with a
25
Court order. Within fourteen (14) days of the date this order is filed, Plaintiff shall file a
26
1
The Court notes that it has previously warned Plaintiff of the consequences of
failing to comply with a Court order. In an order dated June 17, 2013, the Court expressly
warned Plaintiff that "the failure to comply with . . . any order of this Court, may result in
28 the imposition of sanctions, up to and including the dismissal of this lawsuit." Dkt. 125.
27
1
2
3
declaration with the Court explaining why this case should not be dismissed. Failure to
comply with this order will be deemed sufficient grounds to dismiss the action without
further notice.
4
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: 7/11/13
______________________________
SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG
United States District Judge
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
5
SILVERMAN et al,
Plaintiff,
6
7
8
9
10
v.
THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN
FRANCISCO ET AL et al,
Defendant.
/
11
12
Case Number: CV11-01615 SBA
13
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
14
15
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District
Court, Northern District of California.
16
17
18
That on July 11, 2013, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said
copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing
said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle
located in the Clerk's office.
19
20
21
22
23
Jacob Silverman
c/o Brendan Hallinan
345 Franklin Street
San Francisco, CA 94102
24
25
Dated: July 11, 2013
Richard W. Wieking, Clerk
26
By: Lisa Clark, Deputy Clerk
27
28
-3-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?