Singh et al v. Bardini et al

Filing 18

ORDER re 17 MOTION to Continue Plaintiffs' Unopposed Motion to Continue Hearing on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss and Proposed Order filed by Sudesh Kumari Singh, Hardip Zhim Singh, Jarnail Singh, Set/Reset Deadlines as to 17 MOTION to C ontinue Plaintiffs' Unopposed Motion to Continue Hearing on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss and Proposed Order, 10 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction or, in the alternative., Motions terminated: 17 MOTION to Continue Plaintiffs� 39; Unopposed Motion to Continue Hearing on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss and Proposed Order filed by Sudesh Kumari Singh, Hardip Zhim Singh, Jarnail Singh. Motion Hearing set for 2/28/2012 01:00 PM in Courtroom 1, 4th Floor, Oakland before Hon. Saundra Brown Armstrong.. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 10/20/11. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/21/2011)

1

4

JONATHAN M. KAUFMAN, ESQ. (California State Bar No. 104576)
The Law Offices Of Jonathan M. Kaufman
220 Montgomery Street, Suite 976
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-Mail:
[e-mail]

5

Attorney for Plaintiffs

2
3

6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8

OAKLAND DIVISION

9

JARNAIL SINGH, et al.,

Case No. CV-11-1694-SBA

10

PLAINTIFFS’ UNOPPOSED MOTION TO
CONTINUE HEARING ON DEFENDANTS’
MOTION TO DISMISS AND ORDER
[PROPOSED]
XXXXXXXXX

Plaintiffs,
11
vs.
12
EMILIA BARDINI, et al.,
13
14

Defendants.
___________________________________/

15
16
17

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-7, Plaintiffs hereby move the Court for an order continuing
the hearing on Defendants’ motion to dismiss. Good cause appears for this motion as follows.

18

Plaintiffs’ attorney is a sole practitioner who works outside of the San Francisco Bay Area

19

each Monday at an office in northern Monterey County. The Court has scheduled the hearing on

20

Defendants’ motion to dismiss for Monday, October 31, 2011. Plaintiffs’ counsel is unavailable to

21

appear on that date.

22

The parties’ counsel have conferred. Defendants’ counsel Kimberly E. Wiggans has

23

informed Plaintiffs’ counsel that Defendants do not oppose a continuance of the hearing on

24

Defendants’ motion to dismiss to Tuesday, February 28, 2012 at 1:00 p.m.

25
26
27
28

1

1

Based upon the foregoing, Plaintiffs respectfully request that the hearing on Defendants’

2

motion be continued to Tuesday, February 28, 2012 at 1:00 p.m.

3

Dated: October 19, 2011

4

s/s Jonathan M. Kaufman
______________________________
JONATHAN M. KAUFMAN
Attorney for Plaintiffs

5
6
7
ORDER
8

The hearing on Defendants’ motion to dismissed is hereby ordered continued to Tuesday,
9
February 28, 2012 at 1:00 p.m.
10
IT IS SO ORDERED.
11
12
Dated: 10/20/11
13

_________________________________________________
THE HONORABLE SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG
United States District Judge

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2