Zoom Electric, Inc. v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 595
Filing
61
ORDER Setting Schedule. Set/Reset Deadlines as to 20 MOTION to Vacate, 60 MOTION to Dismiss Respondent's First Amended Counter-Complaint, 17 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. Responses due by 12/8/2011. Replies due by 12 /22/2011. Cross Motions due by 12/8/2011. Case Management Statement due by 1/12/2012. Further Case Management Conference set for 1/19/2012 02:00 PM. Motions due by 12/8/2011. Responses due by 12/22/2011. Replies due by 12/29/2011. Motion Hearing set for 1/19/2012 02:00 PM before Hon. Claudia Wilken. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 11/8/2011. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/8/2011)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
3
4
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
ZOOM ELECTRIC, INC., a
California corporation,
Case No. 4:11-cv-01699-CW
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULE
Petitioner,
5
6
v.
7
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF
ELECTRICAL WORKERS, LOCAL
595, a labor organization,
and DOES 1-20,
8
9
Respondents.
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF
ELECTRICAL WORKERS, LOCAL
595, a labor organization,
13
14
15
16
17
18
Counter-Plaintiff.
v.
ZOOM ELECTRIC, INC., a
California corporation; VEIKO
HORAK, individually and as
the alter-ego of ZOOM
ELECTRIC, a sole
proprietorship; and DOES ONE
through TEN, inclusive,
Counter-Defendants.
19
20
21
On October 19, 2011, the Court granted in part Respondent and
22
Counter-Plaintiff International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers
23
(IBEW) Local 595’s Motion to continue the briefing schedule for
24
dispositive motions, pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-3 and for good cause
25
shown.
26
schedule based on the understanding that IBEW’s deposition of
27
Petitioner and Counter-Defendant Zoom Electric, Inc. (ZEI) and
28
Counter-Defendant Veiko Horak had taken place on October 17, 2011.
At that time, the Court set a briefing and hearing
1
The Court also directed the parties to inform the Court if the
2
deposition did not take place on October 17, 2011 and to submit a
3
joint proposed briefing and hearing calendar.
4
The parties have now represented to the Court that the
5
deposition did not take place on October 17, 2011, and that it is
6
now scheduled to occur on November 17, 2011.
7
each filed a separate proposed motion calendar.
8
these filings, on November 8, 2011, ZEI and Horak filed a motion
9
to dismiss the Union’s First Amended Counter-Complaint (Docket No.
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
The parties have
Subsequent to
60).
Having considered the proposals of both parties, the Court
12
orders the briefing and hearing calendar on all dispositive
13
motions to be set as follows:
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Union’s Opposition to Motions to Vacate
and Dismiss; Cross-Motion to Confirm
and Enforce; Motion for Summary
Judgment on Union’s Second Cause of
Action (All contained within a single
twenty-five-page brief)
December 8, 2011
ZEI and Horak’s Reply to Opposition to
Motions to Vacate and Dismiss;
Opposition to Cross-Motion to Confirm
and Enforce; Opposition to Motion for
Summary Judgment (All contained within
a single fifteen-page brief)
December 22, 2011
Union’s Reply to Opposition to CrossMotion to Confirm and Enforce; Reply to
Opposition to Motion for Summary
Judgment (All contained within a single
fifteen-page brief)
December 29, 2011
Hearing on all Dispositive Motions;
Case Management Conference
January 19, 2012,
at 2:00 p.m.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
1
2
The mediation date is maintained as currently set.
3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
11/8/2011
Dated: ___________
5
______________________________
CLAUDIA WILKEN
United States District Judge
6
7
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?