Zoom Electric, Inc. v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 595

Filing 61

ORDER Setting Schedule. Set/Reset Deadlines as to 20 MOTION to Vacate, 60 MOTION to Dismiss Respondent's First Amended Counter-Complaint, 17 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. Responses due by 12/8/2011. Replies due by 12 /22/2011. Cross Motions due by 12/8/2011. Case Management Statement due by 1/12/2012. Further Case Management Conference set for 1/19/2012 02:00 PM. Motions due by 12/8/2011. Responses due by 12/22/2011. Replies due by 12/29/2011. Motion Hearing set for 1/19/2012 02:00 PM before Hon. Claudia Wilken. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 11/8/2011. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/8/2011)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 3 4 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ZOOM ELECTRIC, INC., a California corporation, Case No. 4:11-cv-01699-CW ORDER SETTING SCHEDULE Petitioner, 5 6 v. 7 INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, LOCAL 595, a labor organization, and DOES 1-20, 8 9 Respondents. United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, LOCAL 595, a labor organization, 13 14 15 16 17 18 Counter-Plaintiff. v. ZOOM ELECTRIC, INC., a California corporation; VEIKO HORAK, individually and as the alter-ego of ZOOM ELECTRIC, a sole proprietorship; and DOES ONE through TEN, inclusive, Counter-Defendants. 19 20 21 On October 19, 2011, the Court granted in part Respondent and 22 Counter-Plaintiff International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers 23 (IBEW) Local 595’s Motion to continue the briefing schedule for 24 dispositive motions, pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-3 and for good cause 25 shown. 26 schedule based on the understanding that IBEW’s deposition of 27 Petitioner and Counter-Defendant Zoom Electric, Inc. (ZEI) and 28 Counter-Defendant Veiko Horak had taken place on October 17, 2011. At that time, the Court set a briefing and hearing 1 The Court also directed the parties to inform the Court if the 2 deposition did not take place on October 17, 2011 and to submit a 3 joint proposed briefing and hearing calendar. 4 The parties have now represented to the Court that the 5 deposition did not take place on October 17, 2011, and that it is 6 now scheduled to occur on November 17, 2011. 7 each filed a separate proposed motion calendar. 8 these filings, on November 8, 2011, ZEI and Horak filed a motion 9 to dismiss the Union’s First Amended Counter-Complaint (Docket No. United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 The parties have Subsequent to 60). Having considered the proposals of both parties, the Court 12 orders the briefing and hearing calendar on all dispositive 13 motions to be set as follows: 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Union’s Opposition to Motions to Vacate and Dismiss; Cross-Motion to Confirm and Enforce; Motion for Summary Judgment on Union’s Second Cause of Action (All contained within a single twenty-five-page brief) December 8, 2011 ZEI and Horak’s Reply to Opposition to Motions to Vacate and Dismiss; Opposition to Cross-Motion to Confirm and Enforce; Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment (All contained within a single fifteen-page brief) December 22, 2011 Union’s Reply to Opposition to CrossMotion to Confirm and Enforce; Reply to Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment (All contained within a single fifteen-page brief) December 29, 2011 Hearing on all Dispositive Motions; Case Management Conference January 19, 2012, at 2:00 p.m. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 1 2 The mediation date is maintained as currently set. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 11/8/2011 Dated: ___________ 5 ______________________________ CLAUDIA WILKEN United States District Judge 6 7 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?