Abdur-Rasheed v. Peralta Community Colleges

Filing 28

STIPULATION AND CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER: Case Management Conference set for 12/14/2011 03:30 PM. VIA TELEPHONE. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 10/6/11. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/7/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 MICHAEL T. LUCEY (SBN: 099927) mlucey@gordonrees.com ALYSON S. CABRERA (SBN: 222717) acabrera@gordonrees.com GORDON & REES LLP 275 Battery Street, Suite 2000 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 986-5900 Facsimile: (415) 986-8054 Attorneys for Defendant PERALTA COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT 7 8 9 10 Gordon & Rees LLP 275 Battery Street, Suite 2000 San Francisco, CA 94111 11 ANNE-LEITH MATLOCK (SBN: 244351) anne-leith@matlocklawgroup.com K. BRIAN MATLOCK (SBN: 243812) MATLOCK LAW GROUP, A Professional Corporation 1485 Treat Blvd., Suite 200 Walnut Creek, CA 94597 Telephone: (925) 944-7131 Facsimile: (925) 944-7138 12 13 Attorneys for Plaintiff TAUHEEDAH ABDUR-RASHEED 14 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 OAKLAND DIVISION 18 19 TAUHEEDAH ABDUR-RASHEED 20 21 22 Plaintiff, vs. PERALTA COMMUNITY COLLEGES (LANEY COLLEGE) 23 Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. CV 11-01744 SBA PARTIES’ STIPULATED REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON 24 25 The parties in the above referenced action hereby stipulate as follows: 26 Whereas Plaintiff filed this action in the San Jose Division of the Northern District of 27 28 California on April 8, 2011 in pro per. Whereas on July 19, 2011, this action was transferred to the Oakland Division of the -1Stipulated Request for Continuance of CMC and [Proposed] Order Thereon 1 Northern District of California, and assigned to Judge Armstrong. 2 3 Whereas on August 9, 2011, Judge Armstrong issued a Case Management Order setting a telephonic Case Management Conference for October 19, 2011. 4 5 Whereas on September 23, 2011, attorney Anne-Leith Matlock filed a notice of appearance in this action as counsel for Plaintiff. 6 7 Whereas counsel for the parties met and conferred by telephone on September 27 and October 5, 2011; 8 Whereas Plaintiff agreed to file an Amended Complaint by October 28, 2011; 9 Whereas Defendant agreed to file a Responsive Pleading by November 18, 2011; 10 Gordon & Rees LLP 275 Battery Street, Suite 2000 San Francisco, CA 94111 11 Whereas October 7, 2011, is the last day for the parties to request a continuance of the upcoming telephonic Case Management Conference; 12 The parties hereby request that the telephonic Case Management Conference scheduled 13 for October 19, 2011 be continued to November 23, 2011 or to the next available date that is 14 convenient for the Court. 15 16 Dated: October 5, 2011 GORDON & REES LLP 17 By: 18 19 20 21 Dated: October 6, 2011 /s/ Alyson Cabrera Alyson Cabrera Attorneys for Defendant PERALTA COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT MATLOCK LAW GROUP 22 23 By: 24 25 26 /// 27 /// 28 /s/ Anne-Leith Matlock Anne-Leith Matlock K. Brian Matlock Attorneys for Plaintiff TAUHEEDAH ABDUR-RASHEED /// -2Stipulated Request for Continuance of CMC and [Proposed] Order Thereon 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER RE PARTIES’ STIPULATED REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 2 3 Pursuant to the stipulation of the Parties, the telephonic Case Management Conference 4 scheduled for October 19, 2011 is hereby continued to the following date and time: 5 December 14, 2011 at 3:30 p.m. 6 Plaintiff’s counsel is to set up the conference call with all the parties on the line and call 7 chambers at (510) 637-3559. At least seven (7) days prior to the Case Management Conference, 8 Plaintiff’s counsel shall file a joint case management statement which complies with the 9 Standing Order for All Judges of the Northern District of California and the Standing Orders of 10 Gordon & Rees LLP 275 Battery Street, Suite 2000 San Francisco, CA 94111 11 this Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. 12 13 14 Dated: 10-6-11 Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ASCI/1069845/10867619v.1 -3Stipulated Request for Continuance of CMC and [Proposed] Order Thereon

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?