Kamakahi v. American Society for Reproductive Medicine et al

Filing 13

ORDER re 11 Stipulation, filed by Pacific Fertility Center, Lindsay Kamakahi. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 5/13/11. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/16/2011)

1
2
3
4
5

STEPHEN V. BOMSE (SBN 40686)
[e-mail]
ROBERT A. ROSENFELD (SBN 86970)
[e-mail]
ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
The Orrick Building
405 Howard Street
San Francisco, CA 94105-2669
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

6
7

Attorneys for Defendant
PACIFIC FERTILITY CENTER.

8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12

LINDSAY KAMAKAHI, an individual, on
behalf of herself and all others similarly
situated,

Case No. 3:11-cv-01781 SBA
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT
PACIFIC FERTILITY CENTER’S
LOCAL CIVIL RULE 6-2 JOINT
STIPULATED REQUEST TO
EXTEND TIME OF PACIFIC
FERTILITY CENTER TO RESPOND
TO COMPLAINT

13
Plaintiff,
14
v.
15
16
17

AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR
REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE; SOCIETY
FOR ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE
TECHNOLOGY; PACIFIC FERTILITY
CENTER,

18
Defendants.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED REQUEST TO EXTEND
TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT– CASE NO. 3:11-CV-01781
SBA

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, Defendant Pacific Fertility Center (“PFC”) filed, and
Plaintiff Lindsay Kamakahi stipulated to, a Joint Stipulated Request to Extend Time of PFC to
Respond to Complaint by thirty days.
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED that:
1. Defendant’s Joint Stipulated Request to Extend Time of PFC to Respond to Complaint
is GRANTED.
2. The response deadline to Plaintiff’s Class Action Complaint, currently May 25, 2011,
is extended thirty days and is now Friday, June 24, 2011.

9
10
11
12
13

Dated: 5/13/11
HONORABLE SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED REQUEST TO EXTEND
TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT– CASE NO. 3:11-CV-01781
SBA