Kamakahi v. American Society for Reproductive Medicine et al
Filing
16
ORDER re 14 Stipulation, filed by American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Lindsay Kamakahi, Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 5/24/11. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/25/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Megan Dixon (Cal. Bar. No. 162895)
HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP
4 Embarcadero Center
22nd Floor
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: (415) 374-2300
Facsimile: (415) 374-2499
E-Mail: megan.dixon@hoganlovells.com
Attorneys for Defendants
American Society for Reproductive
Medicine and Society for Assisted
Reproductive Technology
13
Rosemary M. Rivas (Cal. Bar No.209147)
FINKELSTEIN THOMPSON LLP
100 Bush Street, Suite 1450
San Francisco, California 94101
Telephone: (415) 398-8700
Facsimile: (415) 398-8704
Email: rrivas@finkelsteinthompson.com
Bryan L. Clobes (pro hac vice
application forthcoming)
CAFFERTY FAUCHER LLP
1717 Arch Street, 36th Floor
Philadelphia, PA 19103
Telephone: (215) 864-2800
Facsimile: (215) 864-2810
14
Attorneys for Plaintiff Lindsay Kamakahi
Attorneys for Plaintiff Lindsay
Kamakahi
10
11
12
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
16
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
17
18
19
20
LINDSAY KAMAKAHI, an individual
on behalf of herself and all others
similarly situated,
Plaintiffs,
21
22
23
24
25
26
v.
Case No. 3:11-CV-1781 SBA
ORDER GRANTING LOCAL
CIVIL RULE 6-2 JOINT
STIPULATED REQUEST TO
EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO
CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
AND SET BRIEFING SCHEDULE
AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR
REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE;
SOCIETY FOR ASSISTED
REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGY;
PACIFIC FERTILITY CENTER,
27
Defendants.
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO
EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO CLASS ACTION
COMPLAINT AND SET BRIEFING SCHEDULE
\\\068835/000007 - 95633 v1
1
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, the parties hereto have filed a stipulation
2
extending the time for Defendants American Society of Reproductive Medicine
3
(“ASRM”) and Society of Assisted Reproductive Technology (“SART”) to answer
4
or otherwise respond to Plaintiff Lindsay Kamakahi’s Class Action Complaint and
5
setting a briefing schedule in the event that any Defendant in this action files a
6
motion to dismiss.
7
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED that:
8
1.
9
10
11
The time for Defendants ASRM and SART to answer or otherwise
respond to the complaint, which is currently May 20, 2011 for ASRM, and May 24,
2011 for SART, is extended until June 24, 2011.
2.
In the event that any Defendant in this action shall file a motion to
12
dismiss Plaintiff’s Class Action Complaint, the briefing schedule on such motion
13
shall be as follows:
14
Motion to Dismiss and Supporting Memorandum:
June 24, 2011
15
Plaintiff’s Memorandum in Opposition:
July 25, 2011
16
Reply Memorandum
August 15, 2011
17
3.
The haring on any motion to dismiss is scheduled for the next available
18
date of October 18, 2011 at 1:00 p.m. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78(b)
19
and Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court, in its discretion, may resolve the motion without
20
oral argument. The parties are advised to check the Court’s website to determine whether
21
a court appearance is required.
22
IT IS SO ORDERED.
23
24
25
Date: 5/24/11
HONORABLE SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO
EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO CLASS ACTION
COMPLAINT AND SET BRIEFING SCHEDULE
\\\068835/000007 - 95633 v1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?