Burgess v. eBay, Inc. et al

Filing 61

ORDER by Judge ARMSTRONG terminating 31 Motion ; granting 33 Motion for Extension of Time to File; granting 37 Motion for Leave to File (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/21/2012)

Download PDF
1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 ALBERT C. BURGESS, JR., Plaintiff, 4 5 No. C 11-01898 SBA (PR) ORDER REGARDING PENDING MOTIONS v. 6 EBAY, INC., et al., 7 Docket Nos. 31, 33 and 37 Defendants. ________________________________/ 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 This is a pro se civil rights complaint filed by Plaintiff Albert C. Burgess, Jr., an inmate incarcerated in the Low Security Correctional Institution in Butner, North Carolina.1 Several motions are now pending before the Court. On April 4, 2012, Defendant Danny L Durham filed a motion for permission for electronic case filing. (Dkt. no. 31.) This motion is granted. This action has been designated as an e-filing case. If Mr. Durham has not already done so, he should consult the court's public website, www.cand.uscourts.gov, click on the "ECF" link, and register himself if he has the necessary computer and internet access equipment. Because this case is designated as an e-filing case, all documents (orders and motions) will be served on Mr. Durham only electronically (and no paper copy will be sent to him) and all his documents must be filed electronically. On April 9, 2012, Plaintiff moved for an additional fifteen days in which to serve a subpoena on Visa, the only Defendant that had not been served. (Dkt. no. 33.) This motion is granted. On April 30, 2012, Plaintiff moved for leave to file an amended complaint. (Dkt. no. 24 1 In his amended complaint, Plaintiff indicates that, after a ten month incarceration, the state dropped the charges against him. Thus, Plaintiff presently may not be incarcerated. 26 However, the return address on Plaintiff’s amended complaint indicates that he is still in prison. Also, Plaintiff has not informed the Court of a change in address, as he must do under Civil 27 Local Rule 3-11(a) (party proceeding pro se whose address changes while an action is pending, must promptly file with the Court and serve upon all opposing parties a Notice of Change of 28 Address specifying the new address). 25 1 37.) Plaintiff indicated he only wished to correct the names of two Defendants. This motion 2 is granted. 3 4 5 Also pending are Defendants’ motions to dismiss. These motions shall be addressed in a separate order. This Order terminates Docket nos. 31, 33 and 37. 6 7 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: 11/20/12 SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG United States District Judge United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 ALBERT C. BURGESS, JR., 1 Case Number: CV11-01898 SBA 4 5 6 7 Plaintiff, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE v. EBAY INC. et al, Defendant. 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 / I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. That on November 21, 2012, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office. 13 14 15 16 17 18 Albert C. Burgess 88539-071 Low Security Correctional Institution P.O. Box 999 Butner, NC 27509 Danny L Durham 2350 Washington Road Augusta, GA 30904 19 20 21 Dated: November 21, 2012 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk By: Lisa Clark, Deputy Clerk 22 23 L:\PRO-SE\SBA\CR.11\Burgess v EBay1898 3 Motions..wpd 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?