Eguilos et al v. Wells Fargo Bank et al
Filing
12
ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 1/17/12. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/17/2012)
1
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
OAKLAND DIVISION
5
6 FELICITO EGUILOS AND FELICIANA
Case No: C 11-2019 SBA
EGUILOS,
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
7
Plaintiffs,
8
vs.
9
WELLS FARGO, a business form unknown,
10 GOLDEN WEST SAVINGS; DOES I
through X, inclusive, and ROE
11 CORPORATIONS, I through V, inclusive,
Defendants.
12
13
14
Plaintiffs have failed to respond to the Court’s Order to Show Case Re Dismissal
15
(Dkt. 11), which directed them to show cause in writing by December 22, 2011 why the
16
instant action should not be dismissed under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 4(m) and
17
41(b). Having received no response from Plaintiffs,
18
19
20
21
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the instant action is DISMISSED without
prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 17, 2012
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
_______________________________
SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG
United States District Judge
1
FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
2
3
EGUILOS et al,
4
5
6
7
Plaintiff,
v.
WELLS FARGO BANK et al,
Defendant.
/
8
9
Case Number: CV11-02019 SBA
10
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
11
12
13
14
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District
Court, Northern District of California.
That on January 17, 2012, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said
copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing
said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle
located in the Clerk's office.
15
16
17
18
Feliciana Eguilos
2111 Gaynor Avenue
Richmond, CA 94801
20
Felicito Eguilos
2111 Gaynor Avenue
Richmond, CA 94801
21
Dated: January 17, 2012
19
Richard W. Wieking, Clerk
22
By: LISA R CLARK, Deputy Clerk
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?