Banks et al v. Nissan North America, Inc. et al
Filing
32
STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL AS TO NISSAN DESIGN AMERICA re 31 Stipulation filed by Nissan North America, Inc. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 11/29/11. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/29/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
G. CHARLES NIERLICH, SBN 196611
gnierlich@gibsondunn.com
RACHEL A. FLIPSE, SBN 273659
rflipse@gibsondunn.com
GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
555 Mission Street, Suite 3000
San Francisco, California 94105-2933
Telephone: (415) 393-8239
Facsimile: (415) 393-8306
Attorneys for Defendant,
NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC.
13
Clayeo C. Arnold, SBN 65070
Kirk J. Wolden, SBN 138902
Clifford L. Carter, SBN 149621
CLAYEO C. ARNOLD
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
865 Howe Avenue
Sacramento, CA 95825
Telephone: (916) 924-3100
Facsimile: (916) 924-1829
Email: kwolden@justice4you.com
14
Attorneys for Plaintiff and the Class
15
[Additional counsel on signature page]
8
9
10
11
12
16
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
17
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
18
OAKLAND DIVISION
19
20
21
22
BRANDON BANKS and ERIN BANKS,
individually and on behalf of a class of similarly
situated consumers,
25
26
27
JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL
OF NDA
Plaintiffs,
23
24
CASE NO. C 11-2022 PJH
v.
Trial Date:
NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC.; NISSAN
MOTOR CO., LTD.; NISSAN DESIGN
AMERICA, INC.,
None set
Defendants.
28
1
JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL
Case No. C 11-2022 PJH
1
2
3
4
5
The parties, by and through their undersigned counsel, jointly submit this stipulation of
dismissal as to NISSAN DESIGN AMERICA, INC. (hereinafter “NDA”), only:
WHEREAS, NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC. (hereinafter “NNA”), stipulates that NDA
is operated as a division of NNA and NDA no longer exists as a separate legal entity;
WHEREAS, NNA stipulates that NDA used to be a Delaware corporation whose principal
6
place of business was in California during the time that the 2004-2006 Nissan Armada and Titan
7
Trucks, and Infiniti QX56 vehicles (“AFFECTED VEHICLES”) were designed, developed and
8
marketed;
9
10
11
WHEREAS, NNA stipulates that NDA’s liability, if any, arising from the allegations
contained in the lawsuit, is the liability of the now parent corporation NNA;
Based upon these stipulations of NNA , the parties jointly stipulate to the dismissal of NDA.
12
13
DATED: November 22, 2011
Respectfully submitted,
GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
14
15
16
By:
/s/ G. Charles Nierlich ____________
G. Charles Nierlich
17
G. CHARLES NIERLICH, SBN 196611
gnierlich@gibsondunn.com
RACHEL A. FLIPSE, SBN 273659
rflipse@gibsondunn.com
GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
555 Mission Street, Suite 3000
San Francisco, California 94105-2933
Telephone: (415) 393-8239
Facsimile: (415) 393-8306
18
19
20
21
22
TIMOTHY W. LOOSE, SBN 241037
tloose@gibsondunn.com
GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
333 South Grand Avenue
Los Angeles, California 90071-3197
Telephone: (213) 229-7000
Facsimile: (213) 229-7520
23
24
25
26
Attorneys for Defendant
Nissan North America, Inc.
27
28
2
JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL
Case No. C 11-2022 PJH
COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFFS
1
2
By:
3
4
/s/ F. Jerome Tapley _____________
F. Jerome Tapley (pro hac vice)
Clayeo C. Arnold, SBN 65070
Kirk J. Wolden, SBN 138902
Clifford L. Carter, SBN 149621
CLAYEO C. ARNOLD
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
865 Howe Avenue
Sacramento, CA 95825
Telephone: (916) 924-3100
Facsimile: (916) 924-1829
Email: kwolden@justice4you.com
5
6
7
8
9
F. Jerome Tapley (pro hac vice)
Hirlye R. “Ryan” Lutz, III (pro hac vice)
CORY WATSON CROWDER & DEGARIS, P.C.
2131 Magnolia Avenue
Birmingham, AL 35205
Telephone: (205) 328-2200
Facsimile: (205) 324-7896
Email: jtapley@cwcd.com
10
11
12
13
14
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Brandon and Erin Banks
15
16
11/29/11
S
J. Hamilton
A
UNIT
ED
Judge Phyllis
ER
H
LI
FO
R NIA
ORDERED
RT
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
FO
R NIA
IT IS SO
NO
ER
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
25
Judge P
H
24
RT
23
n
Hamilto
hyllis J.
NO
22
ERED
ORD
T IS SO
I
LI
21
UNIT
ED
20
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
19
S
18
A
17
N
D IS T IC T
R
OF
C
26
27
28
3
JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL
Case No. C 11-2022 PJH
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?