Santiago v. City of Salinas et al

Filing 66

ORDER MODIFYING CAPTION AND SEALING DOCUMENTS Compliance Hearing regarding the filing of the properly redacted documents is set for 3/30/2012 09:01 AM before Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers.. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 3/9/12. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/9/2012)

1
2
3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

5
6
7
8

SONIA SANTIAGO, as Guardian Ad Litem
for K.F.,
Plaintiff,

9
10
11

Northern District of California

ORDER MODIFYING CAPTION AND SEALING
DOCUMENTS

vs.
CITY OF SALINAS and SCOTT CALLAN,
Defendants.

12
United States District Court

Case No.: 11-cv-02064-YGR

13

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(a), the parties may include only a minor’s

14
15

initials in any filing with the Court. Accordingly, all future filings in this case shall conform to the

16

new caption as modified above.

17

To protect the interests of the minor K.F., the parties are ORDERED to immediately jointly

18

review the items filed in this action and submit to the Court (via ECF) a list of all documents not in

19

compliance with Rule 5.2(a). For each item, the parties shall provide the specific docket number for

20

each document (e.g., Dkt. No. 1, 1-2, etc.). The Clerk shall seal all documents so identified by the

21

parties.

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

The parties shall re-file properly redacted versions of their previously filed documents by
March 23, 2012. When re-filing these documents, the parties shall have the redacted filings refer back
to the previously filed document. The parties may contact the ECF Help Desk with any questions.
A compliance hearing regarding the filing of the properly redacted documents shall be held on
Friday, March 30, 2012 on the Court’s 9:01a.m. calendar, in the Federal Courthouse, 1301 Clay
Street, Oakland, California, in a courtroom to be designated.

1

Five (5) business days prior to the date of the compliance hearing, the parties shall file either:

2

(a) a certification that the documents in the public record have been properly redacted consistent with

3

Rule 5.2(a); or (b) a one-page JOINT STATEMENT setting forth an explanation for their failure to

4

comply. If compliance is complete, the parties need not appear and the compliance hearing will be

5

taken off calendar.

6
7
8

Telephonic appearances will be allowed if the parties have submitted a joint statement in a
timely fashion. Failure to do so may result in sanctions.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

9
10

Dated: March 9, 2012

11

Northern District of California

United States District Court

12
13

____________________________________
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2