Faulk v. Sears Roebuck and Co

Filing 62

STIPULATION AND AMENDED ORDER REGARDING A CHANGE IN THE BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR NAMED PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION re 61 Order on Stipulation. [Amended to reflect on the document that correct date for filing reply is November 26, 2012 (not 2013)]. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 9/18/12. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/18/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 T. John Kirk (Indiana Bar 27202-29) (Pro Hac Vice) MADDOX HARGETT & CARUSO, P.C. 10100 Lantern Road, Suite 150 Fishers, IN 46037 Telephone: 317-598-2040 Facsimile: 317-598-2050 kirktjohn@mhclaw.com Philip M. Oliss (Pro Hac Vice) Bruce Khula (Pro Hac Vice) SQUIRE SANDERS (US) LLP 4900 Key Tower 127 Public Square Cleveland, OH 44114 Telephone: (216) 479-8500 Facsimile: (216) 479-8780 philip.oliss@squiresanders.com bruce.khula@squiresanders.com Additional counsel listed below 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 14 15 16 17 KEVIN FAULK, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, 18 19 20 21 Plaintiff, -vSEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO., Defendant Case Number: 4:11-CV-02159-YGR STIPULATION REGARDING A CHANGE IN THE BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR NAMED PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION AND AMENDED ORDER 22 23 24 25 Through this Stipulated Request and [Proposed] Order, Plaintiff Kevin Faulk (“Plaintiff”) 26 and Defendant Sears, Roebuck and Co. (“Sears”) stipulate and agree to change the briefing on 27 28 -1STIPULATION REGARDING A CHANGE IN THE BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION - CASE NO: 4:11-CV-02159-YGR 1 Plaintiff’s Motion for Class Certification, and jointly request that the Court approve this change 2 pursuant to L.R. 6-2. 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 WHEREAS, in a minute entry on January 20, 2012, Judge Susan Illston set the following schedule for class certification: Deadline for filing of anticipated class October 5, 2012 certification motion Sears’ opposition to class certification due November 9, 2012 Plaintiff’s reply in support of class certification November 26, 2012 due Hearing on Plaintiff’s motion for class December 17, 2012 certification: 10 11 12 WHEREAS, the case was transferred to the Honorable Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on March 28, 2012 [Dkt. 54]; 13 WHEREAS, on April 3, 2012, Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers reset the hearing date for 14 Plaintiff’s anticipated motion for class certification to December 11, 2012 with the briefing 15 schedule remaining the unchanged [Dkt. 55]; 16 WHEREAS, on July 24, 2012, Plaintiff sent Defendant a letter and requested available 17 dates for depositions of a number of Defendant’s current and former employees located in 18 Oregon, Washington, Chicago, and Las Vegas, and each of those depositions has occurred or has 19 been scheduled to occur during the month of September, with the sole exception of Rick Sawyer, 20 21 22 23 24 a former employee of Defendant discussed in the Amended Complaint and a witness Named Plaintiff believes is key for Plaintiff’s Motion for Class Certification ; WHEREAS, although the Parties have been diligent in trying to schedule Mr. Sawyer’s deposition, the only available date for Named Plaintiff’s counsel, Defendant’s counsel, and Mr. Sawyer is October 3, 2012, two days before the current due date for Named Plaintiff’s Motion 25 for Class Certification; 26 27 28 -2STIPULATION REGARDING A CHANGE IN THE BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION - CASE NO: 4:11-CV-02159-YGR 1 WHEREAS, on August 1, 2012, Defendant sent a letter to Plaintiff’s counsel requesting 2 the deposition of Named Plaintiff in September, but was advised by Plaintiff’s counsel that 3 Named Plaintiff is not unavailable for deposition during the last two weeks of September; 4 WHEREAS, although the Parties have been diligent in trying to schedule Named 5 Plaintiff’s deposition, the first available date for Named Plaintiff, Plaintiff’s counsel, and 6 Defendant’s counsel is October 9, 2012; 7 8 9 10 11 12 WHEREAS, the Parties previously requested a four month extension of the hearing on Plaintiff’s Motion for Class Certification [Dkt. 58]; WHEREAS, the previous request for the extension of the hearing on Plaintiff’s Motion for Class Certification was denied [Dkt. 59]; WHEREAS, the Parties understand the Court’s desire to keep the hearing date on Plaintiff’s Motion for Class Certification. Thus, this Stipulation does not seek to change the 13 hearing date for Plaintiff’s Motion, but only changes its briefing schedule. 14 WHEREAS, while the proposed schedule shortens Defendant’s time in which to oppose 15 class certification, Plaintiff has represented that Defendant will not be prejudiced by the 16 shortened response time as Plaintiff has agreed to identify any potential declarants in a timely 17 fashion and to cooperate fully in Defendant’s efforts to take their depositions sufficiently in 18 advance of the deadline for Sears’ opposition brief. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 ACCORDINGLY, pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12, the Parties hereby stipulate to, and request the Court’s approval of, a change in the class certification briefing schedule, while keeping the same hearing date: Deadline for filing of Plaintiff’s anticipated October 12, 2012 motion for class certification Sears’ opposition to class certification due November 9, 2012 Plaintiff’s reply in support of class certification November 26, 2012 due Hearing on motion for class certification December 11, 2012 27 28 -3STIPULATION REGARDING A CHANGE IN THE BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION - CASE NO: 4:11-CV-02159-YGR 1 2 Dated: September 12, 2012 Respectfully submitted, /s/ T. John Kirk T. John Kirk (Indiana Bar 27202-29) 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Thomas K. Caldwell (Indiana Bar 16001-49) (Pro Hac Vice) MADDOX HARGETT & CARUSO, P.C. 10100 Lantern Road, Suite 150 Fishers, IN 46037 Telephone: 317-598-2040 Facsimile: 317-598-2050 tkcaldwell@mhclaw.com Barbara Quinn Smith (Ohio Bar 0055328) (Pro Hac Vice) MADDOX HARGETT & CARUSO, P.C. 9930 Johnnycake Ridge Road Suite 3F Mentor, OH 44060 Telephone: 440-354-4010 Facsimile: 440-848-8175 bqsmith@mhclaw.com Robert G. Padrick (SBN 103971) LAW OFFICES OF ROBERT G. PADRICK, A PLC 961 Woodside Road, Suite B Redwood City, CA 94061 Telephone: 650-268-9750 Facsimile: 650-268-9750 rgpadrick@padricklaw.com 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Attorneys for Plaintiff /s/ Bruce Khula ____________ Bruce Khula (Pro Hac Vice) Philip M. Oliss (Pro Hac Vice) Bruce Khula (Pro Hac Vice) SQUIRE SANDERS (US) LLP 4900 Key Tower 127 Public Square Cleveland, OH 44114 Telephone: (216) 479-8500 Facsimile: (216) 479-8780 philip.oliss@squiresanders.com -4STIPULATION REGARDING A CHANGE IN THE BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION - CASE NO: 4:11-CV-02159-YGR bruce.khula@squiresanders.com 1 Mark C. Dosker (CA Bar No. 114789) Julie E. Schwartz (CA Bar No. 260624) SQUIRE SANDERS (US) LLP 275 Battery Street, Suite 2600 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 954-0210 Facsimile: (415) 393-9887 mark.dosker@squiresanders.com julie.schwartz@squiresanders.com 2 3 4 5 6 7 Attorneys for Defendant 8 9 10 11 AMENDED 12 13 14 [PROPOSED] ORDER Pursuant to the Stipulation between the Parties, and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that 15 16 17 18 19 20 1. Plaintiff shall file his motion for class certification on or before October 12, 2012; 2. Defendant shall file its response in opposition to the motion for class certification on or before November 9, 2012; 3. Plaintiff shall file his reply in support of the motion for class certification on or before 2012 November 26, 2013; 21 22 23 24 4. The hearing on the motion for class certification will be set for December 11, 2012 or as the Court’s schedule may allow. IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 26 September 18, 2012 Dated: __________________________ ____________________________________ JUDGE YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 27 28 -5- STIPULATION REGARDING A CHANGE IN THE BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION - CASE NO: 4:11-CV-02159-YGR

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?