Duggan v. Astrue

Filing 19

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Signed by Judge Hamilton on 11/23/11. (pjhlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/23/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 CHRISTINE A. DUGGAN, Plaintiff, No. C 11-2176 PJH 12 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 13 14 v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, 15 16 17 Defendant. _________________________________/ On May 3, 2011, plaintiff, who is represented by counsel, filed this appeal from a 18 decision by the Commissioner of Social Security. Defendant answered on August 15, 19 2011. According to Civil Local Rule 16-5, plaintiff was required to file a motion for 20 summary judgment by September 12, 2011. Plaintiff did not do so, and on September 21 29, 2011, the court issued an order to show cause regarding why the appeal should not 22 be dismissed with prejudice for failure to prosecute. 23 On October 4, 2011, Robert Weems, plaintiff’s current counsel, filed a notice of 24 appearance and response to the OSC, notifying the court that plaintiff’s former counsel, 25 Ian Sammis, had passed away and requesting a one-month extension in the briefing 26 schedule. On October 5, 2011, the court discharged the OSC and set a new briefing 27 schedule, which extended plaintiff’s deadline to file her motion for summary judgment to 28 November 9, 2011. To date, plaintiff still has not filed her motion. 1 Plaintiff is hereby ordered to file her motion for summary judgment and to show 2 cause regarding why she failed to file and serve her motion within fourteen days of the 3 date of this order. Plaintiff is advised that if she fails to respond to this court’s order and 4 to file her motion, her appeal will be dismissed with prejudice with no further hearing or 5 briefing. 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 8 Dated: November 23, 2011 9 10 ____________________________________ PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON United States District Judge 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?