Duggan v. Astrue
Filing
19
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Signed by Judge Hamilton on 11/23/11. (pjhlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/23/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
CHRISTINE A. DUGGAN,
Plaintiff,
No. C 11-2176 PJH
12
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
13
14
v.
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of
Social Security,
15
16
17
Defendant.
_________________________________/
On May 3, 2011, plaintiff, who is represented by counsel, filed this appeal from a
18
decision by the Commissioner of Social Security. Defendant answered on August 15,
19
2011. According to Civil Local Rule 16-5, plaintiff was required to file a motion for
20
summary judgment by September 12, 2011. Plaintiff did not do so, and on September
21
29, 2011, the court issued an order to show cause regarding why the appeal should not
22
be dismissed with prejudice for failure to prosecute.
23
On October 4, 2011, Robert Weems, plaintiff’s current counsel, filed a notice of
24
appearance and response to the OSC, notifying the court that plaintiff’s former counsel,
25
Ian Sammis, had passed away and requesting a one-month extension in the briefing
26
schedule. On October 5, 2011, the court discharged the OSC and set a new briefing
27
schedule, which extended plaintiff’s deadline to file her motion for summary judgment to
28
November 9, 2011. To date, plaintiff still has not filed her motion.
1
Plaintiff is hereby ordered to file her motion for summary judgment and to show
2
cause regarding why she failed to file and serve her motion within fourteen days of the
3
date of this order. Plaintiff is advised that if she fails to respond to this court’s order and
4
to file her motion, her appeal will be dismissed with prejudice with no further hearing or
5
briefing.
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
8
Dated: November 23, 2011
9
10
____________________________________
PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON
United States District Judge
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?