Alejandrez v. Kircher et al

Filing 19

ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken DENYING AS PREMATURE PLAINTIFF'S 16 REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' DISPOSITIVE MOTION. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/9/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 7 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 ORDER DENYING AS PREMATURE PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' DISPOSITIVE MOTION Plaintiff, 8 9 No. C 11-02381 CW (PR) LEO ALEJANDREZ, v. M. KIRCHER, et al., Defendants. 11 / (Docket no. 16) 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiff has filed a request for an extension of time in which to file his opposition to Defendants' dispositive motion. Having read and considered Plaintiff's request, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's request for an extension of time is DENIED as premature, as Defendants have not yet filed a dispositive motion. Specifically, Defendants filed an answer to the complaint on December 12, 2011, and, according to the briefing schedule in the Order of Service, their dispositive motion is due no later than ninety (90) days from the date the answer was due. Once Defendants file their dispositive motion, Plaintiff will have sixty (60) days to file an opposition thereto. This Order terminates Docket no. 16. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 1/9/2012 CLAUDIA WILKEN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?