Alejandrez v. Kircher et al
ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken DENYING AS PREMATURE PLAINTIFF'S 16 REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' DISPOSITIVE MOTION. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/9/2012)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
ORDER DENYING AS PREMATURE
PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE
OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS'
No. C 11-02381 CW (PR)
M. KIRCHER, et al.,
(Docket no. 16)
Plaintiff has filed a request for an extension of time in
which to file his opposition to Defendants' dispositive motion.
Having read and considered Plaintiff's request, and good cause
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's request for an extension
of time is DENIED as premature, as Defendants have not yet filed a
Specifically, Defendants filed an answer to
the complaint on December 12, 2011, and, according to the briefing
schedule in the Order of Service, their dispositive motion is due
no later than ninety (90) days from the date the answer was due.
Once Defendants file their dispositive motion, Plaintiff will have
sixty (60) days to file an opposition thereto.
This Order terminates Docket no. 16.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?