Alejandrez v. Kircher et al

Filing 19

ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken DENYING AS PREMATURE PLAINTIFF'S 16 REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' DISPOSITIVE MOTION. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/9/2012)

1
2
3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
6
7

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10

ORDER DENYING AS PREMATURE
PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE
OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS'
DISPOSITIVE MOTION

Plaintiff,

8
9

No. C 11-02381 CW (PR)

LEO ALEJANDREZ,

v.
M. KIRCHER, et al.,
Defendants.

11

/

(Docket no. 16)

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Plaintiff has filed a request for an extension of time in
which to file his opposition to Defendants' dispositive motion.
Having read and considered Plaintiff's request, and good cause
appearing,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's request for an extension
of time is DENIED as premature, as Defendants have not yet filed a
dispositive motion.

Specifically, Defendants filed an answer to

the complaint on December 12, 2011, and, according to the briefing
schedule in the Order of Service, their dispositive motion is due
no later than ninety (90) days from the date the answer was due.
Once Defendants file their dispositive motion, Plaintiff will have
sixty (60) days to file an opposition thereto.
This Order terminates Docket no. 16.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: 1/9/2012
CLAUDIA WILKEN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE