Marilley v. McCamman et al

Filing 133

ORDER Re Briefing on Plaintiffs' Rebuttal Expert Report. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 02/22/2013. (dmrlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/22/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 KEVIN MARILLEY, No. C-11-02418 DMR 13 Plaintiff(s), 14 v. ORDER RE BRIEFING ON PLAINTIFFS’ REBUTTAL EXPERT REPORT 15 CHARLTON BONHAM, 16 17 Defendant(s). ___________________________________/ 18 The court has reviewed the parties’ submissions regarding the timing of Defendant’s 19 anticipated challenge to and/or motion for sanctions regarding Plaintiffs’ rebuttal expert report. 20 [Docket Nos. 129, 132.] Defendant requests an expedited briefing and hearing schedule, but 21 provides no explanation as to why expedited treatment of any such motion is necessary. The court 22 will consider any challenge to Plaintiffs’ rebuttal expert report in connection with the parties’ 23 summary judgment briefing. Defendant may file objections and/or a request for sanctions in a 24 separate brief at the same time he files his cross-motion for summary judgment and opposition to 25 Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment. The brief shall not exceed five pages. Plaintiffs may file 26 an opposition to Defendant’s objections and/or request for sanctions at the same time they file their 27 reply brief in support of their motion for summary judgment and opposition to Defendant’s cross 28 1 motion for summary judgment. Any opposition shall not exceed five pages. There shall be no reply 2 brief. 10 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court ER H 9 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 R NIA FO RT 8 . Ryu DONNAge Donna M M. RYU Jud United States Magistrate Judge NO 7 Dated: February 22, 2013 LI 6 DERED O OR IT IS S A 5 UNIT ED IT IS SO ORDERED. S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O 4 S 3 N D IS T IC T R OF C

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?