Marilley v. McCamman et al

Filing 133

ORDER Re Briefing on Plaintiffs' Rebuttal Expert Report. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 02/22/2013. (dmrlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/22/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
KEVIN MARILLEY,

No. C-11-02418 DMR

13
Plaintiff(s),
14
v.

ORDER RE BRIEFING ON
PLAINTIFFS’ REBUTTAL EXPERT
REPORT

15
CHARLTON BONHAM,
16
17

Defendant(s).
___________________________________/

18
The court has reviewed the parties’ submissions regarding the timing of Defendant’s
19
anticipated challenge to and/or motion for sanctions regarding Plaintiffs’ rebuttal expert report.
20
[Docket Nos. 129, 132.] Defendant requests an expedited briefing and hearing schedule, but
21
provides no explanation as to why expedited treatment of any such motion is necessary. The court
22
will consider any challenge to Plaintiffs’ rebuttal expert report in connection with the parties’
23
summary judgment briefing. Defendant may file objections and/or a request for sanctions in a
24
separate brief at the same time he files his cross-motion for summary judgment and opposition to
25
Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment. The brief shall not exceed five pages. Plaintiffs may file
26
an opposition to Defendant’s objections and/or request for sanctions at the same time they file their
27
reply brief in support of their motion for summary judgment and opposition to Defendant’s cross
28

1

motion for summary judgment. Any opposition shall not exceed five pages. There shall be no reply

2

brief.

10
11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

ER

H

9

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2

R NIA

FO

RT

8

. Ryu

DONNAge Donna M
M. RYU
Jud
United States Magistrate Judge

NO

7

Dated: February 22, 2013

LI

6

DERED

O OR
IT IS S

A

5

UNIT
ED

IT IS SO ORDERED.

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

RT
U
O

4

S

3

N

D IS T IC T
R

OF

C