Marilley v. McCamman et al

Filing 73

Order by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu granting 72 Stipulation Regarding Modification of Briefing Schedule and Hearing Date for Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification.(dmrlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/18/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

KAMALA D. HARRIS
Attorney General of California
ROBERT W. BYRNE
Supervising Deputy Attorney General
CECILIA L. DENNIS, SBN 201997
M. ELAINE MECKENSTOCK, SBN 268861
Deputy Attorneys General
455 Golden Gate Avenue, Suite 11000
San Francisco, CA 94102-7004
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
E-mail: Cecilia.Dennis @doj.ca.gov
Attorneys for Defendant

8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
OAKLAND DIVISION
11
12
13
14

KEVIN MARILLEY, SALVATORE
PAPETTI, and SAVIOR PAPETTI, on
behalf of themselves and similarly situated,

15
16

v.

11-CV-2418-DMR

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER REGARDING MODIFICATION
Plaintiffs, OF BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND
HEARING DATE FOR PLAINTIFFS’
MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION

17
18
19

Judge:
The Honorable Donna Ryu
Action Filed: May 18, 2011

CHARLTON BONHAM, in his personal
and official capacity,
Defendant.

20
21
22

WHEREAS in its initial scheduling order (Doc. 24), the Court set February 2, 2012, as the
date for hearing on a motion for class certification;

23

WHEREAS Plaintiffs filed their motion for class certification on January 5, 2012;

24

WHEREAS under the existing hearing schedule, Defendant’s opposition to the motion for

25
26
27

class certification is due January 19, 2012.
WHEREAS the accompanying declaration of Defendant’s counsel, Deputy Attorney
General Cecilia L. Dennis, addresses the factors identified in Civil Local Rule 6–2.

28
1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING MODIFICATION OF BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND
HEARING DATE FOR PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION (11-CV-2418)

1
2

THE PARTIES HERBY STIPULATE AND AGREE, IN ACCORDANCE WITH CIVIL
LOCAL RULES 6-2 AND 7-12, SUBJECT TO THE COURT’S APPROVAL:

3

1.

4

at 11:00 a.m.

5

2.

6
7

The hearing on Plaintiffs’ motion for class certification is reset to February 23, 2012,

Defendant’s opposition to Plaintiffs’ motion for class certification is now due January

27, 2012;
3.

Plaintiff’s reply to Defendant’s opposition is due February 7, 2012.

8
9

Dated: January 18, 2012

Respectfully submitted,
KAMALA D. HARRIS
Attorney General of California
ROBERT W. BYRNE
Supervising Deputy Attorney General

10
11
12

/s/ Cecilia L. Dennis
_______________________________
CECILIA L. DENNIS
Deputy Attorney General
Attorneys for Defendant

13
14
15
16

Dated: January 18, 2012

GROSS LAW

17
/s/ Stuart G. Gross
_______________________________
STUART G. GROSS
Counsel for Plaintiffs and Proposed Class

18
19
20
21
22

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

23
24
25
26

Dated: January 18, 2012

_________________________________
MAGISTRATE JUDGE DONNA RYU

27
28

SF2011201820
2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING MODIFICATION OF BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND
HEARING DATE FOR PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION (11-CV-2418)