Guttenberg v. Allied Pilots Association Disability Income Plan
Filing
21
AMENDED STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Conference reset to November 3, 2011 at 10:30 a.m. Signed by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler on 10/11/2011. (ls, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/11/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
GLENN R. KANTOR (SBN: 122643)
E-mail: gkantor@kantorlaw.net
NIAMH E. DOHERTY (SBN: 260749)
KANTOR & KANTOR, LLP
19839 Nordhoff Street
Northridge, CA 91324
Telephone: (818) 886-2525
Facsimile: (818) 350-6272
Attorneys for Plaintiff,
PAUL GUTTENBERG
LINDA BALDWIN JONES (SBN: 178922)
EZEKIEL D. CARDER (SBN: 206537)
WEINBERG, ROGER & ROSENFELD
A Professional Corporation
1001 Marina Village Parkway, Suite 200
Alameda, California 94501-1091
Telephone: (510) 337-1001
Facsimile: (510) 337-1023
STEVEN K. HOFFMAN, admitted pro hac vice
DARIN M. DALMAT, admitted pro hac vice
JAMES & HOFFMAN, P.C.
1130 Connecticut Ave., N.W., Suite 950
Washington, DC 20036
Telephone: (202) 496-0500
Facsimile: (202) 496-0555
Attorneys for Defendant,
ALLIED PILOTS ASSOCIATION
DISABILITY INCOME PLAN
18
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
19
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
20
21
PAUL GUTTENBERG,
22
Plaintiff,
CASE NO.: CV11-02435 (LB)
23
v.
AMENDED
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
24
ALLIED PILOTS ASSOCIATION DISABILTY
INCOME PLAN,
(Complaint filed: 5/18/11)
25
26
Defendant.
27
28
1
Stipulation to Continue Case Management Conference (Case No. CV11-02435 (LB))
The parties, by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and agree to the
1
2
following:
3
WHEREAS, pursuant to Local Rule 16-8, the parties requested an Early Settlement
4
Conference with a Magistrate Judge, and filed the Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference on
5
September 16, 2011;
6
7
WHEREAS, the Court set an Initial Case Management Conference in this matter for October
20, 2011 at 10:30 a.m.;
8
9
10
WHEREAS, the parties are hopeful that this matter will resolve at the Early Settlement
Conference with a Magistrate Judge, a date for which has not yet been established, as the ADR Unit
has not yet notified the parties of the date and time for the phone conference;
11
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereby stipulate and agree, subject to the Court’s approval,
12
that the Case Management Conference in this matter set for Thursday, October 20, 2011, be
13
continued to a date after the Settlement Conference.
14
DATED: October 5, 2011
DATED: October 5, 2011
15
By:
By:
16
17
18
19
20
/s/ Glenn R. Kantor
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Glenn R. Kantor, Esq.
Niamh E. Doherty
Kantor & Kantor, LLP
19839 Nordhoff Street
Northridge, CA 91324
Tel: (818) 885-2525
Fax: (818) 350-6272
/s/ Darin M. Dalmat
Attorneys for Defendant
Steven Hoffman
Darin M. Dalmat
James & Hoffman, P.C.
1130 Connecticut Ave., N.W. Ste 200
Washington, DC 20036
Tel: (202) 496-0500
Fax: (202) 496-0555
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Stipulation to Continue Case Management Conference (Case No. CV11-02435 (LB))
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER
S DISTRICT
3
IN ADDITION, THE COURT ORDERS:
H
11
12
FO
LI
RT
8
10
R NIA
er
rel Beel
dge Lau
Ju
HONORABLE LAURA BEELER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
E
Date: October 11, 2011
7
9
D
DENIE
NO
6
Case Management Conference reset to
November 3, 2011 at 10:30 a.m. See
Below:
C
RN
A
5
TA
UNIT
ED
4
S
PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
TE
RT
U
O
2
DI
T
OF
S T RIC
The parties stipulation is DENIED. However, the court CONTINUES the Initial Case Management
Conference to November 3, 2011. The parties shall file an updated joint case management conference
statement no later than October 27, 2011. Further, if the parties prefer, they may appear at the
November 3, 2011 at 10:30 a.m. case management conference by telephone. To do so, the parties
must contact courtroom deputy, Lashanda Scott at (510) 637-3525 no later than October 27, 2011 to
make the necessary arrangements.
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
C
3
Stipulation to Continue Case Management Conference (Case No. CV11-02435 (LB))
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?