Guttenberg v. Allied Pilots Association Disability Income Plan

Filing 21

AMENDED STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Conference reset to November 3, 2011 at 10:30 a.m. Signed by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler on 10/11/2011. (ls, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/11/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 GLENN R. KANTOR (SBN: 122643) E-mail: gkantor@kantorlaw.net NIAMH E. DOHERTY (SBN: 260749) KANTOR & KANTOR, LLP 19839 Nordhoff Street Northridge, CA 91324 Telephone: (818) 886-2525 Facsimile: (818) 350-6272 Attorneys for Plaintiff, PAUL GUTTENBERG LINDA BALDWIN JONES (SBN: 178922) EZEKIEL D. CARDER (SBN: 206537) WEINBERG, ROGER & ROSENFELD A Professional Corporation 1001 Marina Village Parkway, Suite 200 Alameda, California 94501-1091 Telephone: (510) 337-1001 Facsimile: (510) 337-1023 STEVEN K. HOFFMAN, admitted pro hac vice DARIN M. DALMAT, admitted pro hac vice JAMES & HOFFMAN, P.C. 1130 Connecticut Ave., N.W., Suite 950 Washington, DC 20036 Telephone: (202) 496-0500 Facsimile: (202) 496-0555 Attorneys for Defendant, ALLIED PILOTS ASSOCIATION DISABILITY INCOME PLAN 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 19 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 20 21 PAUL GUTTENBERG, 22 Plaintiff, CASE NO.: CV11-02435 (LB) 23 v. AMENDED STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 24 ALLIED PILOTS ASSOCIATION DISABILTY INCOME PLAN, (Complaint filed: 5/18/11) 25 26 Defendant. 27 28 1 Stipulation to Continue Case Management Conference (Case No. CV11-02435 (LB)) The parties, by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and agree to the 1 2 following: 3 WHEREAS, pursuant to Local Rule 16-8, the parties requested an Early Settlement 4 Conference with a Magistrate Judge, and filed the Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference on 5 September 16, 2011; 6 7 WHEREAS, the Court set an Initial Case Management Conference in this matter for October 20, 2011 at 10:30 a.m.; 8 9 10 WHEREAS, the parties are hopeful that this matter will resolve at the Early Settlement Conference with a Magistrate Judge, a date for which has not yet been established, as the ADR Unit has not yet notified the parties of the date and time for the phone conference; 11 NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereby stipulate and agree, subject to the Court’s approval, 12 that the Case Management Conference in this matter set for Thursday, October 20, 2011, be 13 continued to a date after the Settlement Conference. 14 DATED: October 5, 2011 DATED: October 5, 2011 15 By: By: 16 17 18 19 20 /s/ Glenn R. Kantor Attorneys for Plaintiff Glenn R. Kantor, Esq. Niamh E. Doherty Kantor & Kantor, LLP 19839 Nordhoff Street Northridge, CA 91324 Tel: (818) 885-2525 Fax: (818) 350-6272 /s/ Darin M. Dalmat Attorneys for Defendant Steven Hoffman Darin M. Dalmat James & Hoffman, P.C. 1130 Connecticut Ave., N.W. Ste 200 Washington, DC 20036 Tel: (202) 496-0500 Fax: (202) 496-0555 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Stipulation to Continue Case Management Conference (Case No. CV11-02435 (LB)) 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER S DISTRICT 3 IN ADDITION, THE COURT ORDERS: H 11 12 FO LI RT 8 10 R NIA er rel Beel dge Lau Ju HONORABLE LAURA BEELER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE E Date: October 11, 2011 7 9 D DENIE NO 6 Case Management Conference reset to November 3, 2011 at 10:30 a.m. See Below: C RN A 5 TA UNIT ED 4 S PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. TE RT U O 2 DI T OF S T RIC The parties stipulation is DENIED. However, the court CONTINUES the Initial Case Management Conference to November 3, 2011. The parties shall file an updated joint case management conference statement no later than October 27, 2011. Further, if the parties prefer, they may appear at the November 3, 2011 at 10:30 a.m. case management conference by telephone. To do so, the parties must contact courtroom deputy, Lashanda Scott at (510) 637-3525 no later than October 27, 2011 to make the necessary arrangements. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 C 3 Stipulation to Continue Case Management Conference (Case No. CV11-02435 (LB))

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?