Mendez v. R+L Carriers, Inc. et al

Filing 34

ORDER OF REFERENCE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE for Discovery purposes re 29 MOTION to Compel THE FURTHER QUESTIONING OF PLAINTIFFS RANDY J. MARTINEZ AND ROBERT MENDEZ, AND FOR AN ORDER DIRECTING COUNSEL TO REFRAIN FROM ASSERTING IMPROPER OBJECTIONS A ND INSTRUCTIONS NOT TO ANSWER, and 32 MOTION for Sanctions AGAINST PLAINTIFF RANDY J. MARTINEZ AND PLAINTIFF ROBERT MENDEZ, AND THEIR COUNSEL, J.D. HENDERSON, IN THE AMOUNT OF $4, 775.00 PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 30(d)(2) AND 37(a)(5)(A) and Local Rules 37-4. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 3/8/2012. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/8/2012)

Download PDF
1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 5 6 7 ROBERT MENDEZ, an individual; RANDY J. MARTINEZ, an individual; ANTHONY A. HARANG, an individual; KEVIN JOHNSON, SR. an individual and on behalf of all others similarly situated and the general public, United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 15 ORDER OF REFERENCE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE Plaintiffs, 8 9 No. C 11-02478 CW v. R+L CARRIERS INC., a Corporation; R+L CARRIERS SHARED, LLC, a Corporation, and DOES 1-10, Defendants. ________________________________/ Pursuant to Local Rule 72-1, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion to compel the further questioning of Plaintiffs Randy J. 16 Martinez and Robert Mendez, and for an order directing counsel to 17 18 refrain from asserting improper objections and instructions not to 19 answer, the motion for sanctions, and all further discovery 20 motions filed in the above-captioned case are referred to a 21 Magistrate Judge. The hearing noticed for Thursday, April 12, 22 2012, is vacated. Counsel will be advised of the date, time and 23 place of appearance by notice from the assigned Magistrate Judge. 24 25 26 Dated: 3/8/2012 27 28 cc: MagRef CLAUDIA WILKEN United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?