Mendez v. R+L Carriers, Inc. et al
ORDER OF REFERENCE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE for Discovery purposes re 29 MOTION to Compel THE FURTHER QUESTIONING OF PLAINTIFFS RANDY J. MARTINEZ AND ROBERT MENDEZ, AND FOR AN ORDER DIRECTING COUNSEL TO REFRAIN FROM ASSERTING IMPROPER OBJECTIONS A ND INSTRUCTIONS NOT TO ANSWER, and 32 MOTION for Sanctions AGAINST PLAINTIFF RANDY J. MARTINEZ AND PLAINTIFF ROBERT MENDEZ, AND THEIR COUNSEL, J.D. HENDERSON, IN THE AMOUNT OF $4, 775.00 PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 30(d)(2) AND 37(a)(5)(A) and Local Rules 37-4. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 3/8/2012. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/8/2012)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
ROBERT MENDEZ, an individual;
RANDY J. MARTINEZ, an individual;
ANTHONY A. HARANG, an individual;
KEVIN JOHNSON, SR. an individual
and on behalf of all others
similarly situated and the
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
No. C 11-02478 CW
R+L CARRIERS INC., a Corporation;
R+L CARRIERS SHARED, LLC, a
Corporation, and DOES 1-10,
Pursuant to Local Rule 72-1, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the
motion to compel the further questioning of Plaintiffs Randy J.
Martinez and Robert Mendez, and for an order directing counsel to
refrain from asserting improper objections and instructions not to
answer, the motion for sanctions, and all further discovery
motions filed in the above-captioned case are referred to a
The hearing noticed for Thursday, April 12,
2012, is vacated.
Counsel will be advised of the date, time and
place of appearance by notice from the assigned Magistrate Judge.
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?