Mendez v. R+L Carriers, Inc. et al

Filing 42

TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER. Responses due by 3/26/2012. Replies due by 3/28/2012. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 3/23/2012. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/23/2012)

Download PDF
  UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION ROBERT MENDEZ, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Case No. CV 11-02478 CW TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER R+L CARRIERS, Inc., a Corporation, R&L CARRIERS SHARED SERVICES, LLC, a Corporation, and DOES 1-10, Defendants. TO R+L CARRIERS, INC. AND R&L CARRIERS SHARED SERVICES, LLC, AND ITS ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: Based upon the Application for Order to Show Cause and Temporary Restraining Order, the Memorandum of Points and Authorities, the declaration of Michael Morrison, and attached exhibits, the Declarations in Support of Order to Show Cause and Temporary Restraining Order, and all other pleadings and documents which comprise the record in this case, pending the Court’s decision on the application for a Temporary Restraining Order, you and your employees, agents, and persons acting on your behalf, are enjoined from: (1) any precertification communications with any putative class members regarding the instant lawsuit, unless pre-approved by the Court; (2) obtaining any declarations from any putative class members in this action, unless pre-approved by the Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT: Defendant’s motion for time to oppose the application is granted. Any opposition to the application for a Temporary Restraining Order shall be filed no later than March 26, 2012. Any reply papers shall be filed no later than March 28, 2012. In the alternative, the parties may stipulate to an alternative briefing schedule on all pending motions. IT IS SO ORDERED. 3/23/2012 Dated: _______________ ____________________________________ Hon. Claudia Wilken

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?