Mendez v. R+L Carriers, Inc. et al
Filing
76
ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken Granting 75 Stipulation TO CONTINUE THE MARCH 7, 2013 HEARING ON DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR CERTIFICATION OF INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE TO MARCH 14, 2013. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/5/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
David S. Eisen (SBN 100623)
Diana M. Estrada (SBN 212702)
Gregory K. Lee (SBN 220354)
Robert Cooper (SBN 209641)
WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ,
EDELMAN & DICKER LLP
555 Flower Street, Suite 2900
Los Angeles, California 90071-2407
Telephone:
(213) 443-5100
Facsimile:
(213) 443-5101
Email:
david.eisen@wilsonelser.com
diana.estrada@wilsonelser.com
gregory.lee@wilsonelser.com
robert.cooper@wilsonelser.com
Attorneys for Defendants R+L Carriers, Inc. and
R+L Carriers Shared Services, LLC
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
ROBERT MENDEZ, an individual,
RANDY J. MARTINEZ, an individual,
ANTHONY A. HARANG, an individual,
KEVIN JOHNSON, SR., an individual on
behalf of all others similarly situated and the
general public,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiffs, )
)
v.
)
)
R&L CARRIERS, INC., a Corporation,
)
R&L CARRIERS SHARED SERVICES,
)
LLC, a Corporation, and DOES 1-10,
)
)
Defendants. )
)
Case No.:
Action Filed:
Judge:
CV 11-02478-CW
May 20, 2011
Hon. Claudia Wilken
STIPULATION OF PARTIES TO
CONTINUE THE MARCH 7, 2013
HEARING ON DEFENDANTS’
MOTION FOR CERTIFICATION OF
INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL AND
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
TO MARCH 14, 2013 AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER
Courtroom:
Hearing Date:
Hearing Time:
2
March 7, 2013
2:00 p.m.
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION OF PARTIES TO CONTINUE THE MARCH 7, 2013 HEARING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR
CERTIFICATION OF INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE TO MARCH 14, 2013
AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
1759695.1
1
WHEREAS the Motion for Certification of Interlocutory Appeal of Defendants R+L
2
Carriers, Inc. and R+L Carriers Shared Services, LLC and a Case Management Conference are
3
both scheduled to take place on March 7, 2013, at 2:00 p.m.; and
4
WHEREAS a scheduling conflict has arisen with regard to the March 7, 2013 date;
5
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BY THE PARTIES BY AND THROUGH THEIR
6
COUNSEL OF RECORD THAT that the Motion hearing and Case Management Conference
7
date be continued to March 14, 2013, at 2:00 p.m.
8
IT IS SO STIPULATED
9
10
DATED: February 4, 2013
WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ,
EDELMAN & DICKER LLP
11
12
By: /s/ David S. Eisen
David S. Eisen
Diana M. Estrada
Attorneys for Defendants
R+L CARRIERS SHARED SERVICES, LLC and
R+L CARRIERS, INC.
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
DATED: February 4, 2013
ALEXANDER KRAKOW + GLICK LLP
LAW OFFICES OF THOMAS W. FALVEY
By: /s/ J.D. Henderson
J.D. Henderson
Michael Morrison
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Robert Mendez
Randy Martinez
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
STIPULATION OF PARTIES TO CONTINUE THE MARCH 7, 2013 HEARING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR
CERTIFICATION OF INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE TO MARCH 14, 2013
AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
1759695.1
[PROPOSED] ORDER
1
2
Having reviewed the Joint Stipulation to continue the hearing on Defendants’ Motion for
3
Certification of Interlocutory Appeal and the Case Management Conference, which are currently
4
both scheduled for March 7, 2013, at 2:00 p.m., the Court HEREBY ORDERS AS FOLLOWS:
5
6
7
The hearing on Defendants’ Motion for Certification of Interlocutory Appeal and the
Case Management Conference are both continued to March 14, 2013, at 2:00 p.m.
8
9
10
11
12
IT IS SO ORDERED
2/5/2013
DATE:______________
______________________________________
HON. CLAUDIA WILKEN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION OF PARTIES TO CONTINUE THE MARCH 7, 2013 HEARING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR
CERTIFICATION OF INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE TO MARCH 14, 2013
AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
1759695.1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?