Mendez v. R+L Carriers, Inc. et al

Filing 76

ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken Granting 75 Stipulation TO CONTINUE THE MARCH 7, 2013 HEARING ON DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR CERTIFICATION OF INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE TO MARCH 14, 2013. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/5/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 David S. Eisen (SBN 100623) Diana M. Estrada (SBN 212702) Gregory K. Lee (SBN 220354) Robert Cooper (SBN 209641) WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, EDELMAN & DICKER LLP 555 Flower Street, Suite 2900 Los Angeles, California 90071-2407 Telephone: (213) 443-5100 Facsimile: (213) 443-5101 Email: david.eisen@wilsonelser.com diana.estrada@wilsonelser.com gregory.lee@wilsonelser.com robert.cooper@wilsonelser.com Attorneys for Defendants R+L Carriers, Inc. and R+L Carriers Shared Services, LLC 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ROBERT MENDEZ, an individual, RANDY J. MARTINEZ, an individual, ANTHONY A. HARANG, an individual, KEVIN JOHNSON, SR., an individual on behalf of all others similarly situated and the general public, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) R&L CARRIERS, INC., a Corporation, ) R&L CARRIERS SHARED SERVICES, ) LLC, a Corporation, and DOES 1-10, ) ) Defendants. ) ) Case No.: Action Filed: Judge: CV 11-02478-CW May 20, 2011 Hon. Claudia Wilken STIPULATION OF PARTIES TO CONTINUE THE MARCH 7, 2013 HEARING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR CERTIFICATION OF INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE TO MARCH 14, 2013 AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Courtroom: Hearing Date: Hearing Time: 2 March 7, 2013 2:00 p.m. 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION OF PARTIES TO CONTINUE THE MARCH 7, 2013 HEARING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR CERTIFICATION OF INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE TO MARCH 14, 2013 AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 1759695.1 1 WHEREAS the Motion for Certification of Interlocutory Appeal of Defendants R+L 2 Carriers, Inc. and R+L Carriers Shared Services, LLC and a Case Management Conference are 3 both scheduled to take place on March 7, 2013, at 2:00 p.m.; and 4 WHEREAS a scheduling conflict has arisen with regard to the March 7, 2013 date; 5 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BY THE PARTIES BY AND THROUGH THEIR 6 COUNSEL OF RECORD THAT that the Motion hearing and Case Management Conference 7 date be continued to March 14, 2013, at 2:00 p.m. 8 IT IS SO STIPULATED 9 10 DATED: February 4, 2013 WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, EDELMAN & DICKER LLP 11 12 By: /s/ David S. Eisen David S. Eisen Diana M. Estrada Attorneys for Defendants R+L CARRIERS SHARED SERVICES, LLC and R+L CARRIERS, INC. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 DATED: February 4, 2013 ALEXANDER KRAKOW + GLICK LLP LAW OFFICES OF THOMAS W. FALVEY By: /s/ J.D. Henderson J.D. Henderson Michael Morrison Attorneys for Plaintiffs Robert Mendez Randy Martinez 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 STIPULATION OF PARTIES TO CONTINUE THE MARCH 7, 2013 HEARING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR CERTIFICATION OF INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE TO MARCH 14, 2013 AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 1759695.1 [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 2 Having reviewed the Joint Stipulation to continue the hearing on Defendants’ Motion for 3 Certification of Interlocutory Appeal and the Case Management Conference, which are currently 4 both scheduled for March 7, 2013, at 2:00 p.m., the Court HEREBY ORDERS AS FOLLOWS: 5 6 7 The hearing on Defendants’ Motion for Certification of Interlocutory Appeal and the Case Management Conference are both continued to March 14, 2013, at 2:00 p.m. 8 9 10 11 12 IT IS SO ORDERED 2/5/2013 DATE:______________ ______________________________________ HON. CLAUDIA WILKEN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 STIPULATION OF PARTIES TO CONTINUE THE MARCH 7, 2013 HEARING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR CERTIFICATION OF INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE TO MARCH 14, 2013 AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 1759695.1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?