Cobb v. Consunji et al
Filing
36
ORDER re 35 Stipulation. Case Management Statement due by 11/23/2011. Initial Case Management Conference set for 11/30/2011 01:30 PM. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 10/04/2011. (dmrlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/4/2011)
1
2
Jason Cobb
1101 Menlo Oaks Dr.
Menlo Park, CA 94025
3
Plaintiff Pro Se
4
MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
Howard Holderness, Bar No. 169814
hholderness@morganlewis.com
Dennis J. Sinclitico, Jr., Bar No. 240260
dsinclitico@morganlewis.com
One Market, Spear Street Tower
San Francisco, CA 94105-1126
Tel: 415.442.1000
Fax: 415.442.1001
5
6
7
8
9
10
Attorneys for Defendants
CHRISTINA CONSUNJI, CHRIS GLASSER, TERRY
JOHNSON, CASS KALINSKI, JEFF MONK, VANITA
NEMALI
11
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
OAKLAND DIVISION
15
16
JASON E. COBB, an Individual,
Plaintiff,
17
vs.
18
19
20
21
CHRISTINA CONSUNJI, CHRIS
GLASSER, TERRY JOHNSON,
CASS KALINSKI, JEFF MONK,
VANITA NEMALI, JOHN DOE 1,
JOHN DOE 2, JOHN DOE 3,
Individuals,
Civil Action No. CV 11-02496-DMR
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER VACATING NOVEMBER 23, 2011
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Case Management Conference Information
Date: November 23, 2011
Time: 1:30 p.m.
Courtroom: 4
Date of Filing:
May 23, 2011
22
Defendants.
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE:
CONFERENCE STATEMENT
CASE NO.: CV 11 - 02496 DMR
DB2/ 22693485.1
1
This Stipulation is made by and between Plaintiff Jason E. Cobb (“Plaintiff”) and
2
Defendants Christina Consunji, Chris Glasser, Terry Johnson, Cass Kalinski, Jeff Monk, and
3
Vanita Nemali (collectively, “Defendants”) (collectively, the “Parties”) with respect to the
4
following facts:
5
WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed this case on May 23, 2011;
6
WHEREAS, on September 27, 2011, the Court issued an order setting the initial Case
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Management Conference for November 23, 2011;
WHEREAS, Defendants’ counsel, Dennis Sinclitico, has a previously scheduled vacation
during that time and does not anticipate being able to participate in the Case Management
Conference via telephone on that date;
WHEREAS, the Parties submit that there are no currently-set deadlines that will be
affected by a short continuance of the Case Management Conference;
WHEREAS, Plaintiff does not object to a short continuance of the Case Management
Conference;
THEREFORE, the Parties hereby stipulate and request that the Court issue an order
16
vacating the Case Management Conference currently on calendar for November 23, 2011 and
17
reschedule Case Management Conference to the following week or another date convenient to the
18
Court’s calendar.
19
20
Dated: October 4, 2011
JASON E. COBB
21
BY:
22
PLAINTIFF PRO SE
23
Dated: October 4, 2011
/S/
MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
24
25
By:
26
/s/
DENNIS J. SINCLITICO JR.
Attorneys for Defendants
CONSUNJI, ET AL.
27
28
2
Include Draft Include Date Include Time
STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE:
CONFERENCE STATEMENT
CASE NO.: CV 11 - 02496 DMR
1
2
3
4
[PROPOSED] ORDER
In light of the foregoing stipulation of the Parties and finding good cause for doing so, the
Case Management Conference currently on calendar for November 23, 2011 is hereby vacated
and rescheduled to November 30, 2011 at 1:30 p.m.
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
Dated: Oct. 4, 2011 _________
_______________________________
DONNA M. RYU
United States Magistrate Judge
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
nclude Draft Include Date Include Time
STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE:
CONFERENCE STATEMENT
CASE NO.: CV 11 - 02496 DMR
1
2
3
4
PROOF OF SERVICE
I, Eileen H. Yemoto, declare:
I am a citizen of the United States and employed in County, California. I am over the age
of eighteen years and not a party to the within-entitled action. My business address is One
Market, Spear Street Tower, San Francisco, CA 94105-1126. On October 4, 2011, I served a
copy of the within document(s):
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER VACATING
NOVEMBER 23, 2011 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
by transmitting via facsimile the document(s) listed above to the fax number(s) set
forth below on this date before 5:00 p.m.
by placing the document(s) listed above in a sealed envelope with postage thereon
fully prepaid, the United States mail at San Francisco, California addressed as set
forth below.
by OVERNIGHT DELIVERY (FedEx): I placed the document(s) listed above into
envelope(s) or package(s) designated by the express service carrier and addressed
to the person(s for collection and overnight delivery by following the ordinary
business practices of Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, San Francisco, California. I
am readily familiar with the firm’s practice for collecting and processing of
correspondence for overnight delivery, said practice being that, in the ordinary
course of business, correspondence for overnight delivery is deposited with
delivery fees paid or provided for at the carrier’s express service offices for nextday delivery the same day as the correspondence is placed for collection.
by transmitting via e-mail or electronic transmission the document(s) listed above
to the person(s) at the e-mail address(es) set forth below.
Jason E. Cobb
1101 Menlo Oaks Drive
Menlo Park, CA 94025
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
I am readily familiar with the firm's practice of collection and processing correspondence
for mailing. Under that practice it would be deposited with the U.S. Postal Service on that same
day with postage thereon fully prepaid in the ordinary course of business. I am aware that on
motion of the party served, service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date or postage
meter date is more than one day after date of deposit for mailing in affidavit.
Executed on October 4, 2011, at San Francisco, California.
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the above
is true and correct.
27
/s/
Eileen H. Yemoto
28
4
nclude Draft Include Date Include Time
STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE:
CONFERENCE STATEMENT
CASE NO.: CV 11 - 02496 DMR
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?