Cobb v. Consunji et al

Filing 36

ORDER re 35 Stipulation. Case Management Statement due by 11/23/2011. Initial Case Management Conference set for 11/30/2011 01:30 PM. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 10/04/2011. (dmrlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/4/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 Jason Cobb 1101 Menlo Oaks Dr. Menlo Park, CA 94025 3 Plaintiff Pro Se 4 MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP Howard Holderness, Bar No. 169814 hholderness@morganlewis.com Dennis J. Sinclitico, Jr., Bar No. 240260 dsinclitico@morganlewis.com One Market, Spear Street Tower San Francisco, CA 94105-1126 Tel: 415.442.1000 Fax: 415.442.1001 5 6 7 8 9 10 Attorneys for Defendants CHRISTINA CONSUNJI, CHRIS GLASSER, TERRY JOHNSON, CASS KALINSKI, JEFF MONK, VANITA NEMALI 11 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 OAKLAND DIVISION 15 16 JASON E. COBB, an Individual, Plaintiff, 17 vs. 18 19 20 21 CHRISTINA CONSUNJI, CHRIS GLASSER, TERRY JOHNSON, CASS KALINSKI, JEFF MONK, VANITA NEMALI, JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2, JOHN DOE 3, Individuals, Civil Action No. CV 11-02496-DMR JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER VACATING NOVEMBER 23, 2011 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Case Management Conference Information Date: November 23, 2011 Time: 1:30 p.m. Courtroom: 4 Date of Filing: May 23, 2011 22 Defendants. 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: CONFERENCE STATEMENT CASE NO.: CV 11 - 02496 DMR DB2/ 22693485.1 1 This Stipulation is made by and between Plaintiff Jason E. Cobb (“Plaintiff”) and 2 Defendants Christina Consunji, Chris Glasser, Terry Johnson, Cass Kalinski, Jeff Monk, and 3 Vanita Nemali (collectively, “Defendants”) (collectively, the “Parties”) with respect to the 4 following facts: 5 WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed this case on May 23, 2011; 6 WHEREAS, on September 27, 2011, the Court issued an order setting the initial Case 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Management Conference for November 23, 2011; WHEREAS, Defendants’ counsel, Dennis Sinclitico, has a previously scheduled vacation during that time and does not anticipate being able to participate in the Case Management Conference via telephone on that date; WHEREAS, the Parties submit that there are no currently-set deadlines that will be affected by a short continuance of the Case Management Conference; WHEREAS, Plaintiff does not object to a short continuance of the Case Management Conference; THEREFORE, the Parties hereby stipulate and request that the Court issue an order 16 vacating the Case Management Conference currently on calendar for November 23, 2011 and 17 reschedule Case Management Conference to the following week or another date convenient to the 18 Court’s calendar. 19 20 Dated: October 4, 2011 JASON E. COBB 21 BY: 22 PLAINTIFF PRO SE 23 Dated: October 4, 2011 /S/ MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP 24 25 By: 26 /s/ DENNIS J. SINCLITICO JR. Attorneys for Defendants CONSUNJI, ET AL. 27 28 2 Include Draft Include Date Include Time STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: CONFERENCE STATEMENT CASE NO.: CV 11 - 02496 DMR 1 2 3 4 [PROPOSED] ORDER In light of the foregoing stipulation of the Parties and finding good cause for doing so, the Case Management Conference currently on calendar for November 23, 2011 is hereby vacated and rescheduled to November 30, 2011 at 1:30 p.m. 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 Dated: Oct. 4, 2011 _________ _______________________________ DONNA M. RYU United States Magistrate Judge 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 nclude Draft Include Date Include Time STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: CONFERENCE STATEMENT CASE NO.: CV 11 - 02496 DMR 1 2 3 4 PROOF OF SERVICE I, Eileen H. Yemoto, declare: I am a citizen of the United States and employed in County, California. I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to the within-entitled action. My business address is One Market, Spear Street Tower, San Francisco, CA 94105-1126. On October 4, 2011, I served a copy of the within document(s): 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER VACATING NOVEMBER 23, 2011 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE by transmitting via facsimile the document(s) listed above to the fax number(s) set forth below on this date before 5:00 p.m. by placing the document(s) listed above in a sealed envelope with postage thereon fully prepaid, the United States mail at San Francisco, California addressed as set forth below. by OVERNIGHT DELIVERY (FedEx): I placed the document(s) listed above into envelope(s) or package(s) designated by the express service carrier and addressed to the person(s for collection and overnight delivery by following the ordinary business practices of Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, San Francisco, California. I am readily familiar with the firm’s practice for collecting and processing of correspondence for overnight delivery, said practice being that, in the ordinary course of business, correspondence for overnight delivery is deposited with delivery fees paid or provided for at the carrier’s express service offices for nextday delivery the same day as the correspondence is placed for collection. by transmitting via e-mail or electronic transmission the document(s) listed above to the person(s) at the e-mail address(es) set forth below. Jason E. Cobb 1101 Menlo Oaks Drive Menlo Park, CA 94025 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 I am readily familiar with the firm's practice of collection and processing correspondence for mailing. Under that practice it would be deposited with the U.S. Postal Service on that same day with postage thereon fully prepaid in the ordinary course of business. I am aware that on motion of the party served, service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date or postage meter date is more than one day after date of deposit for mailing in affidavit. Executed on October 4, 2011, at San Francisco, California. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the above is true and correct. 27 /s/ Eileen H. Yemoto 28 4 nclude Draft Include Date Include Time STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: CONFERENCE STATEMENT CASE NO.: CV 11 - 02496 DMR

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?