Glauser v. Twilio, Inc. et al

Filing 29

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE re 28 Stipulation, filed by Twilio, Inc. Joint Case Management Statement due by 9/15/2011. Initial Case Management Conference set for 9/22/2011 02:00 PM. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 8/31/11. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/31/2011)

Download PDF
1 Patrick S. Thompson (SBN 160804) pthompson@goodwinprocter.com 2 Anna Hsia (SBN 234179) ahsia@goodwinprocter.com 3 Audrey M. Lin (SBN 271671) alin@goodwinprocter.com 4 GOODWIN PROCTER LLP Three Embarcadero Center, 24th Floor 5 San Francisco, California 94111 Tel.: 415.733.6000 6 Fax: 415.677.9041 7 Attorneys for Defendant Twilio, Inc., a Delaware Corporation 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 OAKLAND DIVISION 12 BRIAN GLAUSER, individually and on behalf 13 of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, 14 15 Case No. CV11-2584 PJH [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE v. 16 TWILIO, INC., a Delaware corporation, GROUPME, INC., a Delaware corporation, 17 Defendants. 18 Date: Time: Courtroom: Judge: September 15, 2011 2:00 p.m. 3 Hon. Phyllis J. Hamilton 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Case No. CV11-2584 PJH 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 2 The parties’ August 30, 2011 Stipulation to Continue the September 15, 2011 Case 3 Management Conference, having been presented to the Court for approval; and the Court having 4 read and considered the Stipulation presented by the parties for approval; and good cause 5 appearing therefore, order that the Case Management Conference is continued to September 22, 6 2011. 7 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 RT ER n Hamilto A H 13 hyllis J. R NIA NO 12 Judge P FO S ___________________________________________ The Honorable ERED PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON OO D UnitedRStates District Judge IT IS S LI 11 S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O 10 8/31/11 DATED: ___________________ UNIT ED 9 N F D IS T IC T O R C 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 [[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Case No. CV11-2584 PJH PROOF OF SERVICE 1 2 I, Randolph Roque, declare: 3 I am employed in the County of Los Angeles, State of California. I am over the age of 18 st 4 and not a party to the within action. My business address is 601 South Figueroa Street, 41 Floor, 5 Los Angeles, California 90017. 6 On August 30, 2011, I served the following documents by placing a true copy thereof in a 7 sealed envelope(s) on the persons below as follows: 8 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 9 Sean Patrick Reis 10 EDELSON MCGUIRE, LLP 30021 Tomas Street, Suite 300 11 Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688 Counsel for Plaintiff BRIAN GLAUSER Tel. 949-459-2124 Fax. 949-459-2123 E-Mail: sreis@edelson.com 12 Christopher L. Dore Jay Edelson 13 Rafey Sarkis Balabanian EDELSON MCGUIRE, LLC 14 350 North LaSalle Street, Suite 1300 Chicago, IL 60654 15 Renu Rebecca George WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 16 650 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, CA 94304 17 Gerard M. Stegmaier 18 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 1700 K. Street, NW, 5th Floor 19 Washington, D.C. 20006-3817 Counsel for Plaintiff BRIAN GLAUSER Tel. 312-589-6370 Fax. 312-589-6378 E-Mail: cdore@edelson.com E-Mail: jedelson@edelson.com E-Mail: rbalabanian@edelson.com 20 Tonia Maria Ouellette Klausner WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 21 1301 Avenue of the Americas, 40th Floor New York, NY 10019-6022 22 Counsel for Defendant GROUPME, INC. Tel: 212-999-5800 Fax: 212-999-5899 E-Mail: tklausner@wsgr.com Counsel for Defendant GROUPME, INC. Tel. 650-493-9300 Fax. 650-565-5100 E-Mail: RGeorge@wsgr.com Counsel for Defendant GROUPME, INC. Tel: 202-973-8800 Fax: 202-973-8899 E-Mail: gstegmaier@wsgr.com 23 24 25 26 27 (MAIL) I placed the envelope for collection and mailing, following our ordinary business practices. I am readily familiar with this firm’s practice for collecting and processing correspondence for mailing. On the same day that correspondence is placed for collection and mailing, it is deposited in the ordinary course of business with the United States Postal Service, in a sealed envelope with postage fully prepaid. I am a resident or employed in the county where the mailing occurred. The envelope or package was placed in the mail at San Francisco, California. 28 PROOF OF SERVICE Case No. CV11-2584 PJH 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 (CM/ECF Electronic Filing) I caused the above document(s) to be transmitted to the office(s) of the addressee(s) listed above by electronic mail at the e-mail address(es) set forth above pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P.5(d)(1). “A Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) is generated automatically by the ECF system upon completion of an electronic filing. The NEF, when e-mailed to the e-mail address of record in the case, shall constitute the proof of service as required by Fed.R.Civ.P.5(d)(1). A copy of the NEF shall be attached to any document served in the traditional manner upon any party appearing pro se.” (EXPRESS MAIL) I placed the envelope for collection and mailing, following our ordinary business practices. I am readily familiar with this firm's practice for collecting and processing Express Mail for mailing. On the same day that Express Mail is placed for collection and mailing, it is deposited in the ordinary course of business with the United States Postal Service, in a post office, mailbox, sub-post office, substation, mail chute, or other like facility regularly maintained by the United States Postal Service for receipt of Express Mail. (OVERNIGHT DELIVERY) I deposited in a box or other facility regularly maintained by Federal Express , an express service carrier, or delivered to a courier or driver authorized by said express service carrier to receive documents, a true copy of the foregoing document in sealed envelopes or packages designated by the express service carrier, addressed as stated above, with fees for overnight delivery paid or provided for. (MESSENGER SERVICE) I served the documents by placing them in an envelope or package addressed to the persons at the addresses listed and provided them to a professional messenger service for service. A separate Personal Proof of Service provided by the professional messenger service will be filed under separate cover. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 (FACSIMILE) Based on an agreement of the parties to accept service by fax transmission, I faxed the documents to the persons at the fax numbers listed. No error was reported by the fax machine that I used. A copy of the record of the fax transmission, which I printed out, is attached. (E-MAIL or ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION) Based on a court order or an agreement of the parties to accept service by e-mail or electronic transmission, I caused the documents to be sent to the persons at the e-mail addresses listed. I did not receive, within a reasonable time after the transmission, any electronic message or other indication that the transmission was unsuccessful. I declare under penalty of perjury that I am employed in the office of a member of the bar of this Court at whose direction this service was made and that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on August 30, 2011, at Los Angeles California. 23 24 25 26 Randolph Roque (Type or print name) (Signature) 27 28 PROOF OF SERVICE Case No. CV11-2584 PJH

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?