Glauser v. Twilio, Inc. et al
Filing
29
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE re 28 Stipulation, filed by Twilio, Inc. Joint Case Management Statement due by 9/15/2011. Initial Case Management Conference set for 9/22/2011 02:00 PM. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 8/31/11. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/31/2011)
1 Patrick S. Thompson (SBN 160804)
pthompson@goodwinprocter.com
2 Anna Hsia (SBN 234179)
ahsia@goodwinprocter.com
3 Audrey M. Lin (SBN 271671)
alin@goodwinprocter.com
4 GOODWIN PROCTER LLP
Three Embarcadero Center, 24th Floor
5 San Francisco, California 94111
Tel.: 415.733.6000
6 Fax: 415.677.9041
7 Attorneys for Defendant
Twilio, Inc., a Delaware Corporation
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
OAKLAND DIVISION
12
BRIAN GLAUSER, individually and on behalf
13 of all others similarly situated,
Plaintiff,
14
15
Case No. CV11-2584 PJH
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
v.
16 TWILIO, INC., a Delaware corporation,
GROUPME, INC., a Delaware corporation,
17
Defendants.
18
Date:
Time:
Courtroom:
Judge:
September 15, 2011
2:00 p.m.
3
Hon. Phyllis J. Hamilton
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO
CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Case No. CV11-2584 PJH
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING THE CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE
2
The parties’ August 30, 2011 Stipulation to Continue the September 15, 2011 Case
3
Management Conference, having been presented to the Court for approval; and the Court having
4
read and considered the Stipulation presented by the parties for approval; and good cause
5
appearing therefore, order that the Case Management Conference is continued to September 22,
6
2011.
7
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
RT
ER
n
Hamilto
A
H
13
hyllis J.
R NIA
NO
12
Judge P
FO
S
___________________________________________
The Honorable ERED
PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON
OO D
UnitedRStates District Judge
IT IS S
LI
11
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
10
8/31/11
DATED: ___________________
UNIT
ED
9
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
[[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO
CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Case No. CV11-2584 PJH
PROOF OF SERVICE
1
2
I, Randolph Roque, declare:
3
I am employed in the County of Los Angeles, State of California. I am over the age of 18
st
4 and not a party to the within action. My business address is 601 South Figueroa Street, 41 Floor,
5 Los Angeles, California 90017.
6
On August 30, 2011, I served the following documents by placing a true copy thereof in a
7 sealed envelope(s) on the persons below as follows:
8
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
9
Sean Patrick Reis
10 EDELSON MCGUIRE, LLP
30021 Tomas Street, Suite 300
11 Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688
Counsel for Plaintiff BRIAN GLAUSER
Tel. 949-459-2124
Fax. 949-459-2123
E-Mail: sreis@edelson.com
12 Christopher L. Dore
Jay Edelson
13 Rafey Sarkis Balabanian
EDELSON MCGUIRE, LLC
14 350 North LaSalle Street, Suite 1300
Chicago, IL 60654
15 Renu Rebecca George
WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
16 650 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, CA 94304
17
Gerard M. Stegmaier
18 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
1700 K. Street, NW, 5th Floor
19 Washington, D.C. 20006-3817
Counsel for Plaintiff BRIAN GLAUSER
Tel. 312-589-6370
Fax. 312-589-6378
E-Mail: cdore@edelson.com
E-Mail: jedelson@edelson.com
E-Mail: rbalabanian@edelson.com
20 Tonia Maria Ouellette Klausner
WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
21 1301 Avenue of the Americas, 40th Floor
New York, NY 10019-6022
22
Counsel for Defendant GROUPME, INC.
Tel: 212-999-5800
Fax: 212-999-5899
E-Mail: tklausner@wsgr.com
Counsel for Defendant GROUPME, INC.
Tel. 650-493-9300
Fax. 650-565-5100
E-Mail: RGeorge@wsgr.com
Counsel for Defendant GROUPME, INC.
Tel: 202-973-8800
Fax: 202-973-8899
E-Mail: gstegmaier@wsgr.com
23
24
25
26
27
(MAIL) I placed the envelope for collection and mailing, following our ordinary
business practices. I am readily familiar with this firm’s practice for collecting and
processing correspondence for mailing. On the same day that correspondence is placed
for collection and mailing, it is deposited in the ordinary course of business with the
United States Postal Service, in a sealed envelope with postage fully prepaid. I am a
resident or employed in the county where the mailing occurred. The envelope or
package was placed in the mail at San Francisco, California.
28
PROOF OF SERVICE
Case No. CV11-2584 PJH
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
(CM/ECF Electronic Filing) I caused the above document(s) to be transmitted to the
office(s) of the addressee(s) listed above by electronic mail at the e-mail address(es) set
forth above pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P.5(d)(1). “A Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) is
generated automatically by the ECF system upon completion of an electronic filing. The
NEF, when e-mailed to the e-mail address of record in the case, shall constitute the proof
of service as required by Fed.R.Civ.P.5(d)(1). A copy of the NEF shall be attached to
any document served in the traditional manner upon any party appearing pro se.”
(EXPRESS MAIL) I placed the envelope for collection and mailing, following our
ordinary business practices. I am readily familiar with this firm's practice for collecting
and processing Express Mail for mailing. On the same day that Express Mail is placed
for collection and mailing, it is deposited in the ordinary course of business with the
United States Postal Service, in a post office, mailbox, sub-post office, substation, mail
chute, or other like facility regularly maintained by the United States Postal Service for
receipt of Express Mail.
(OVERNIGHT DELIVERY) I deposited in a box or other facility regularly maintained
by Federal Express , an express service carrier, or delivered to a courier or driver
authorized by said express service carrier to receive documents, a true copy of the
foregoing document in sealed envelopes or packages designated by the express service
carrier, addressed as stated above, with fees for overnight delivery paid or provided for.
(MESSENGER SERVICE) I served the documents by placing them in an envelope or
package addressed to the persons at the addresses listed and provided them to a
professional messenger service for service. A separate Personal Proof of Service
provided by the professional messenger service will be filed under separate cover.
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
(FACSIMILE) Based on an agreement of the parties to accept service by fax
transmission, I faxed the documents to the persons at the fax numbers listed. No error
was reported by the fax machine that I used. A copy of the record of the fax
transmission, which I printed out, is attached.
(E-MAIL or ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION) Based on a court order or an agreement
of the parties to accept service by e-mail or electronic transmission, I caused the
documents to be sent to the persons at the e-mail addresses listed. I did not receive,
within a reasonable time after the transmission, any electronic message or other
indication that the transmission was unsuccessful.
I declare under penalty of perjury that I am employed in the office of a member of the bar
of this Court at whose direction this service was made and that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on August 30, 2011, at Los Angeles California.
23
24
25
26
Randolph Roque
(Type or print name)
(Signature)
27
28
PROOF OF SERVICE
Case No. CV11-2584 PJH
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?