Glauser v. Twilio, Inc. et al

Filing 59

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS re 58 Stipulation filed by Twilio, Inc., GroupMe, Inc., Brian Glauser. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 10/25/11. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/25/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 BRYAN A. MERRYMAN (134357) J. JONATHAN HAWK (254350) WHITE & CASE LLP 633 W. Fifth Street, Suite 1900 Los Angeles, CA 90071-2007 Telephone: (213) 620-7700 Facsimile: (213) 452-2329 Email: bmerryman@whitecase.com Email: jhawk@whitecase.com BIJAL VAKIL (192878) JEREMY OSTRANDER (233489) WHITE & CASE LLP 5 Palo Alto Square, 9th Floor 3000 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA 94306 Telephone: (650) 213-0300 Facsimile: (650) 213-8158 Email: bvakil@whitecase.com Email: jostrander@whitecase.com Attorneys for Defendant GROUPME, INC. 18 JAY EDELSON (PHV) RAFEY S. BALABANIAN (PHV) CHRISTOPHER L. DORE (PHV) EDELSON MCGUIRE LLC 350 North LaSalle Street, Suite 1300 Chicago, IL 60654 Telephone: (312) 589-6370 Facsimile: (312) 589-6378 Email: jedelson@edelson.com Email: rbalabanian@edelson.com Email: cdore@edelson.com Attorneys for Plaintiff and Putative Classes PATRICK S. THOMPSON (160804) ANNA HSIA (234179) AUDREY M. LIN (271671) GOODWIN PROCTER LLP Three Embarcadero Center, 24th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94111 415-733-6000 Fax: 415-677-9041 Email: pthompson@goodwinprocter.com Email: ahsia@goodwinprocter.com Email: alin@goodwinprocter.com 19 SEAN P. REIS (184044) EDELSON MCGUIRE LLP 30021 Tomas Street, Suite 300 Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688 Telephone: (949) 459-2124 Facsimile: (949) 459-2123 Email: sreis@edelson.com Attorneys for Defendant TWILIO, INC. 14 15 16 17 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 BRIAN GLAUSER, individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated individuals, Plaintiffs, v. TWILIO, INC., a Delaware corporation; and GROUPME, INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendants. Case No. 4:11-cv-02584-PJH JOINT STIPULATION EXTENDING THE PARTIES’ BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS AMENDED COMPLAINT Complaint Filed: May 27, 2011 Trial Date: None set. 28 4:11-CV-02584-PJH 1 Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1, Plaintiff Brian Glauser, individually and on behalf of a class 2 of similarly situated individuals (“Plaintiff”), and Defendants GroupMe, Inc. (“GroupMe”) and 3 Twilio, Inc. (collectively referred to herein as the “Parties”), by and through their respective 4 counsel of record, hereby stipulate to modify the Parties’ briefing schedule as it pertains to both 5 Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss the Amended Complaint as follows: 6 7 8 9 WHEREAS, on September 15, 2011, Plaintiff filed his amended complaint against GroupMe and Twilio alleging violations of the TCPA. WHEREAS, on September 29, 2011, this Court entered an order extending Defendant GroupMe’s time to respond to Plaintiff’s amended Complaint. 10 WHEREAS, on September 29, 2011, Twilio moved to dismiss the amended complaint. 11 WHEREAS, on October 6, 2011, GroupMe also moved to dismiss the amended complaint. 12 WHEREAS, on October 12, 2011, the Parties filed a joint stipulation to extend the briefing 13 schedule on Defendants’ motions to dismiss, which the Court granted on October 14, 2011, 14 setting October 20, 2011 as Plaintiff’s deadline to oppose Defendants’ motions, and November 3, 15 2011, as Defendants’ deadline to reply. 16 WHEREAS, Plaintiff is in need of an additional one-week extension to file his oppositions 17 to Defendants’ respective motions to dismiss because Plaintiff’s counsel’s computer systems have 18 experienced extended disruptions in service over the course of the past week, which has 19 hampered their ability to prepare opposition papers in time to meet the October 20 filing deadline. 20 WHEREAS, based on the foregoing, the Parties have agreed to extend Plaintiff’s time to 21 file his opposition to both Defendants’ motions by one-week, to October 27, 2011. The Parties 22 have further agreed to extend Defendants’ deadline to file any reply brief to November 17, 2011. 23 WHEREAS, this extension is not sought for any improper purpose. 24 WHEREAS, the extension of time sought will not alter the date of any event or deadline 25 26 27 28 already fixed by Court Order. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE and AGREE, subject to the approval of the Court, that: 1. Plaintiff shall have until October 27, 2011, to file any opposition papers to 2 4:11-CV-02584-PJH 1 2 3 Defendants Twilio’s and GroupMe’s respective motions to dismiss; 2. Defendants shall have until November 17, 2011, to file any reply papers in support of their respective motions to dismiss. 4 Respectfully submitted, 5 6 7 Dated: October 17, 2011 WHITE & CASE LLP 8 By: 9 10 11 Dated: October 17, 2011 /s/ J. Jonathan Hawk J. Jonathan Hawk Attorneys for Defendant GroupMe, Inc. EDELSON MCGUIRE LLC 12 By: 13 14 15 Dated: October 17, 2011 /s/ Rafey S. Balabanian Rafey S. Balabanian Attorneys for Plaintiff Brian Glauser GOODWIN PROCTER LLP 16 By: 17 18 /s/ Patrick S. Thompson Patrick S. Thompson Attorneys for Defendant Twilio, Inc. 19 20 21 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. UNIT ED 24 25 DATED: October ____, 2011 26 RT 27 FO NO R NIA __________________________________ HONORABLE PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON n UNITED STATES DISTRICT iJUDGE Ham lto hyllis J. Judge P H ER LI 25 DERED O OR IT IS S 28 3 A 23 S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O S 22 N F D IS T IC T O R C 4:11-CV-02584-PJH 1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 2 I, Christopher L. Dore, an attorney, hereby certify that on October 17, 2011, I served the above and foregoing Joint Stipulation Extending the Parties’ Briefing Schedule on Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss Amended Complaint, by causing true and accurate copies of such paper to be filed and transmitted to all counsel of record via the Court’s CM/ECF electronic filing system. 3 4 5 6 /s/ Christopher L. Dore 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?