Glauser v. Twilio, Inc. et al

Filing 88

ORDER by Judge Hamilton denying 81 Motion to Lift Stay (pjhlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/4/2013)

1
2
3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

5
6
7

BRIAN GLAUSER, individually and on
behalf of all other similarly situated,

8
Plaintiff,

No. C 11-2584 PJH

9
v.

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO
LIFT STAY

TWILIO, INC., et al.,
11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12

Defendants.
_______________________________/

13
14

Plaintiff’s motion to lift stay came on for hearing before this court on December 4,

15

2013. Plaintiff Brian Glauser (“plaintiff”) appeared through his counsel, Benjamin Richman.

16

Defendant GroupMe, Inc. appeared through its counsel, Bryan Merryman. Defendant

17

Twilio, Inc. appeared through its counsel, Patrick Thompson. Having read the parties’

18

papers and carefully considered their arguments and the relevant legal authority, and good

19

cause appearing, the court hereby DENIES without prejudice plaintiff’s motion to lift the

20

stay for the reasons stated at the hearing and as follows.

21

The court finds that there is a likelihood that the FCC will issue an agenda for the

22

coming year sometime in January 2014. Accordingly, the court hereby vacates the January

23

27, 2014 deadline to file a joint status statement, and instead orders the parties to appear

24

for a case management conference on March 27, 2014 at 2:00pm. The parties are also

25

directed to file a joint case management conference statement by March 20, 2014. At the

26

time of the case management conference, the court will revisit plaintiff’s request to lift the

27

stay in this action.

28

1
2

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: December 4, 2013
______________________________
PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON
United States District Judge

3
4
5
6
7
8
9

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2