Pimental v. Google, Inc. et al
Filing
25
ORDER CONSOLIDATING RELATED CASES: C-11-2585-SBA and C-11-3333-SBA and Appointing Edelson McGuire LLC and interim lead counsel for Plaintiffs and the Class and Weiss & Lurie as liason counsel re 23 Stipulation. Signed by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong, on 9/22/11. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/22/2011) Modified on 9/23/2011 (jlm, COURT STAFF). Modified on 9/23/2011 (jlm, COURT STAFF).
1
2
3
4
5
SEAN REIS (SBN 184044)
(sreis@edelson.com)
EDELSON MCGUIRE, LLP
30021 Tomas Street, Suite 300
Rancho Santa Margarita, California 92688
Telephone: (949) 459-2124
Facsimile: (949) 459-2123
[Additional counsel appearing on signature page]
6
7
Attorneys for Plaintiffs NICOLE PIMENTAL,
JESSICA FRANKLIN and the Putative Classes
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
NICOLE PIMENTAL, individually and on
behalf of all others similarly situated,
Class Action
12
13
Case No.: 11-cv-02585-SBA
Plaintiff,
ORDER CONSOLIDATING RELATED
CASES, APPOINTING INTERIM LEAD
COUNSEL AND AUTHORIZING FILING
GOOGLE, INC., a Delaware corporation, and OF PLAINTIFFS’ CONSOLIDATED
SLIDE, INC., a Delaware Corporation,
COMPLAINT
vs.
14
15
16
17
18
19
Defendants.
__________________________________
JESSICA FRANKLIN, individually and on
behalf of all others similarly situated,
Plaintiff,
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
vs.
GOOGLE, INC., a Delaware corporation, and
SLIDE, INC., a Delaware Corporation,
Defendants.
Case No.: 11-cv-3333-SBA
Class Action
1
Having considered the parties’ Stipulation to Consolidate Related Cases and
2
Authorize Filing of Plaintiffs’ Consolidated Complaint (the “Stipulation”), and finding that
3
the cases below involve common questions of law and fact, and that efficiency, consistency
4
and reduced cost and delay will result from consolidation and the other relief sought, the
5
Court ORDERS as follows:
6
7
1.
The following cases are hereby consolidated for all purposes pursuant to Rule
42(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure before the Honorable Saundra B. Armstrong:
8
9
10
Case Name
Case Number
Nicole Pimental v. Google, Inc., 11-cv-02585
and Slide, Inc.
Date Filed
Judge
05/27/2011
Saundra B. Armstrong
07/07/2011
Saundra B. Armstrong
11
12
13
Jessica Franklin v. Google,
Inc., and Slide, Inc.
2.
11-cv-3333
These actions are referred to herein as the “Consolidated Action.” This order
14
(the “Order”) shall apply to the Consolidated Action and to each case that is subsequently
15
filed in this Court or transferred to this Court that is found to relate to the same matter as the
16
Consolidated Action, unless a party objecting to the consolidation of such case or to any
17
other provision of this Order files, within ten (10) days after the date upon which a copy of
18
this Order is served on counsel for such party, an application for relief from this Order or any
19
provision herein, and this Court deems it appropriate to grant such application.
20
21
22
23
3.
Any related action that is subsequently filed in, or transferred to this District
shall be consolidated for all purposes as soon as it is brought to the Court’s attention.
4.
Every pleading in this proceeding, or in any separate action included herein
shall bear the following caption:
24
25
26
27
28
[Proposed] Order Re Consolidation
-2-
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
1
2
3
4
NICOLE PIMENTAL and JESSICA
FRANKLIN, individually and on behalf of
all others similarly situated,
Plaintiffs,
5
vs.
6
7
8
9
10
Case No. 11-cv-2585-SBA
GOOGLE INC., a Delaware corporation,
and SLIDE, INC., a Delaware Corporation,
Defendants.
___________________________________
This Document Relates To:
11
12
13
5.
14
applicable, the words “All Actions” shall appear immediately after the words “This
15
Document Relates To:” in the caption set out above. When a pleading is intended to be
16
applicable only to some, but not all, of such actions, the Court’s docket number for each
17
individual action to which the paper is intended to be applicable and the last name of the
18
plaintiff in said action shall appear after the words “This Document Relates To:” in the
19
caption set out above.
20
21
When a pleading is intended to be applicable to all actions to which this Order is
6.
When a case that relates to the same subject matter of the Consolidated Action
is hereafter filed in this Court or transferred from another court, the Clerk of this Court shall:
22
a.
File a copy of this Order in the separate file for such action;
23
b.
Mail a copy of the Order to counsel for the plaintiff(s) in the newly-
24
25
26
filed case; and
c.
Make the appropriate entry in the Master Docket for the Consolidated
Action.
27
28
[Proposed] Order Re Consolidation
-3-
1
7.
The Court requests the assistance of counsel in calling to the attention of the
2
Clerk of this Court the filing or transfer of any case that might properly be consolidated as a
3
part of this Consolidated Action.
4
8.
Edelson McGuire LLC is hereby appointed to serve as interim lead counsel
5
for Plaintiffs and the Class, and Weiss & Lurie is hereby appointed to serve as liaison
6
counsel for Plaintiffs and the Class in this consolidated proceeding pursuant to Fed. R. Civ.
7
P. 23(g)(3). The Court finds that Edelson McGuire LLC and Weiss & Lurie satisfy the
8
criteria set out in Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(g)(1)(A)(i)-(iv).
9
9.
Plaintiffs in this Consolidated Action shall serve upon defendants a single
10
consolidated class action complaint (the “Consolidated Complaint”). The Consolidated
11
Complaint shall supersede all existing complaints filed in the Consolidated Action.
12
13
IT IS SO ORDERED.
14
15
DATED: 9/22/11
16
___________________________________
HONORABLE SAUNDRA B. ARMSTRONG
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[Proposed] Order Re Consolidation
-4-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?