Pimental v. Google, Inc. et al

Filing 36

ORDER by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong GRANTING 35 Stipulation. Plaintiffs Opposition due 11/11/11; Defendants' Reply due 12/2/11. Signed by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong, on 10/28/11. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/31/2011) Modified on 11/1/2011 (jlm, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 4 SEAN REIS - SBN 184004 EDELSON MCGUIRE LLP 30021 Tomas Street, Suite 300 Rancho Santa Margarita, California 92688 Telephone: (949) 459-2124 sreis@edelson.com 5 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 6 BOBBIE J. WILSON – SBN 148317 JOSHUA A. REITEN – SBN 238985 PERKINS COIE LLP Four Embarcadero Center 24th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111-4024 (415) 344-7166 bwilson@perkinscoie.com 2 3 7 8 9 10 11 Attorneys for Defendants 12 13 [additional counsel appearing on signature page] 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION 15 16 17 18 NICOLE PIMENTAL and JESSICA FRANKLIN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, 19 20 21 Case No. 11-cv-02585-SBA [ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION EXTENDING THE PARTIES’ BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT v. GOOGLE INC., a Delaware corporation, and SLIDE, INC., a Delaware corporation, 22 Defendants. 23 24 Having considered the parties’ Joint Stipulation to modify the briefing schedule as it 25 pertains to both Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss the Consolidated Complaint, and good 26 cause shown, the Court hereby ORDERS: 27 28 PROPOSED ORDER 11-cv-02585-SBA 1 2 3 4 1. Plaintiffs shall have until and including November 11, 2011, to file any opposition papers to Defendants’ motion to dismiss; 2. Defendants shall have until and including December 2, 2011, to file any reply papers in support of their motion to dismiss. 5 6 DATED: 10/28/11 _____________________________ 7 Hon. Saundra Brown Armstrong 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PROPOSED ORDER 11-cv-02585-SBA 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?