Pimental v. Google, Inc. et al

Filing 52

Renotice motion hearing re 29 MOTION to Dismiss Consolidated Class Action Complaint filed byGoogle, Inc., Slide, Inc.. Motion Hearing set for 3/6/2012 02:00 PM before Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. (Related document(s) 29 ) (Wilson, Bobbie) (Filed on 1/20/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 PERKINS COIE LLP BOBBIE J. WILSON (Bar No. 148317) JOSHUA A. REITEN (Bar No. 238985) Four Embarcadero Center, Suite 2400 San Francisco, CA 94111-4131 Telephone: (415) 344-7000 Facsimile: (415) 344-7050 E-mail: bwilson@perkinscoie.com 5 6 7 8 9 DEBRA R. BERNARD (Pro hac vice) 131 S. Dearborn St., Suite 1700 Chicago, IL 60603 Telephone: (312) 324-8559 Facsimile: (312) 324-9559 E-mail: dbernard@perkinscoie.com Attorneys for Defendants GOOGLE INC. and SLIDE, INC. 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 OAKLAND DIVISION 14 15 16 NICOLE PIMENTAL and JESSICA FRANKLIN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 17 18 19 Plaintiffs, v. GOOGLE INC., a Delaware corporation, and SLIDE, INC., a Delaware corporation, 20 Defendants. Case No. 11-cv-02585-YGR RE-NOTICE OF DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT UNDER FED. R. CIV. P. 12(b)(6) Date: Time: Place: Judge: 21 22 This Document Relates to All Actions. 23 24 25 26 27 28 RE-NOTICE OF DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS Case No. 11-cv-02585-YGR March 6, 2012 2:00 p.m. [Courtroom TBD] Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers RE-NOTICE OF MOTION1 1 2 TO THE COURT, ALL INTERESTED PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: 3 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT on March 6, 2012, at 2:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as 4 the matter may be heard, in the United States District Courthouse (courtroom to be assigned on 5 the date of hearing), 1301 Clay Street, Oakland, California, 94612, before the Honorable Yvonne 6 Gonzalez Rogers, Defendants Google Inc. and Slide, Inc. will, and hereby do, move the Court for 7 an order dismissing the Consolidated Class Action Complaint (“Complaint” or “CCAC”). The 8 Motion is made pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on the grounds 9 that (a) the Complaint fails to allege facts sufficient to state a claim under the Telephone 10 Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”), 47 U.S.C. § 227, upon which relief can be granted; and 11 (b) construing the TCPA to prohibit the Disco SMS messages would violate the First 12 Amendment. 13 This Motion is based upon this Re-Notice, the Memorandum of Points and Authorities 14 filed on October 14, 2011 (Dkt. No. 29), the Request for Judicial Notice filed on October 14, 15 2011 (Dkt. No. 30), the reply memorandum filed on December 2, 2011 (Dkt. No. 45), the 16 pleadings and files in this action, and such other matters as may be presented at or before the 17 hearing. 18 19 DATED: January ___, 2012 20 PERKINS COIE LLP By: /s/ Bobbie J. Wilson BOBBIE J. WILSON 21 Attorneys for Defendants GOOGLE INC. and SLIDE, INC. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 Defendants originally noticed this motion for a hearing on February 28, 2012, before the Honorable Saundra Brown Armstrong. Defendants hereby re-notice this motion pursuant to Part A.7. of the January 18, 2012 order that reassigned this case to the Honorable Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. Dkt. No. 50. -1- RE-NOTICE OF DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS Case No. 11-cv-02585-YGR

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?