Pimental v. Google, Inc. et al

Filing 52

Renotice motion hearing re 29 MOTION to Dismiss Consolidated Class Action Complaint filed byGoogle, Inc., Slide, Inc.. Motion Hearing set for 3/6/2012 02:00 PM before Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. (Related document(s) 29 ) (Wilson, Bobbie) (Filed on 1/20/2012)

1
2
3
4

PERKINS COIE LLP
BOBBIE J. WILSON (Bar No. 148317)
JOSHUA A. REITEN (Bar No. 238985)
Four Embarcadero Center, Suite 2400
San Francisco, CA 94111-4131
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-mail:
[e-mail]

5
6
7
8
9

DEBRA R. BERNARD (Pro hac vice)
131 S. Dearborn St., Suite 1700
Chicago, IL 60603
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-mail:
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendants
GOOGLE INC. and SLIDE, INC.

10
11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

12

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

13

OAKLAND DIVISION

14
15
16

NICOLE PIMENTAL and JESSICA
FRANKLIN, individually and on behalf of
all others similarly situated,

17
18
19

Plaintiffs,
v.
GOOGLE INC., a Delaware corporation,
and SLIDE, INC., a Delaware corporation,

20
Defendants.

Case No. 11-cv-02585-YGR
RE-NOTICE OF DEFENDANTS’ MOTION
TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’
CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION
COMPLAINT UNDER FED. R. CIV. P.
12(b)(6)
Date:
Time:
Place:
Judge:

21
22

This Document Relates to All Actions.

23
24
25
26
27
28
RE-NOTICE OF DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS
Case No. 11-cv-02585-YGR

March 6, 2012
2:00 p.m.
[Courtroom TBD]
Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers

RE-NOTICE OF MOTION1

1
2

TO THE COURT, ALL INTERESTED PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:

3

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT on March 6, 2012, at 2:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as

4

the matter may be heard, in the United States District Courthouse (courtroom to be assigned on

5

the date of hearing), 1301 Clay Street, Oakland, California, 94612, before the Honorable Yvonne

6

Gonzalez Rogers, Defendants Google Inc. and Slide, Inc. will, and hereby do, move the Court for

7

an order dismissing the Consolidated Class Action Complaint (“Complaint” or “CCAC”). The

8

Motion is made pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on the grounds

9

that (a) the Complaint fails to allege facts sufficient to state a claim under the Telephone

10

Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”), 47 U.S.C. § 227, upon which relief can be granted; and

11

(b) construing the TCPA to prohibit the Disco SMS messages would violate the First

12

Amendment.

13

This Motion is based upon this Re-Notice, the Memorandum of Points and Authorities

14

filed on October 14, 2011 (Dkt. No. 29), the Request for Judicial Notice filed on October 14,

15

2011 (Dkt. No. 30), the reply memorandum filed on December 2, 2011 (Dkt. No. 45), the

16

pleadings and files in this action, and such other matters as may be presented at or before the

17

hearing.

18
19

DATED: January ___, 2012

20

PERKINS COIE LLP
By: /s/ Bobbie J. Wilson
BOBBIE J. WILSON

21

Attorneys for Defendants
GOOGLE INC. and SLIDE, INC.

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

1

Defendants originally noticed this motion for a hearing on February 28, 2012, before the
Honorable Saundra Brown Armstrong. Defendants hereby re-notice this motion pursuant to Part
A.7. of the January 18, 2012 order that reassigned this case to the Honorable Yvonne Gonzalez
Rogers. Dkt. No. 50.
-1-

RE-NOTICE OF DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS
Case No. 11-cv-02585-YGR