Jordan v. Coronado et al

Filing 13

ORDER re 1 Complaint, filed by Imhotep Jordan, Jr.. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 10/21/11. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/25/2011)

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

3

IMHOTEP JORDAN, JR.,

4
5
6

Plaintiff,

ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO
FILE COMPLETED COMPLAINT
FORM; AND DIRECTING HIM TO PAY
THE FILING FEE OR FILE A
COMPLETED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
APPLICATION

v.
J. CORONADO, et al.,

7

Defendants.

8
9

No. C 11-02668 SBA (PR)

/

On June 3, 2011, this case was opened when Plaintiff submitted a "Request for Entry of
Default Judgment Pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure" as well as a document entitled,

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

"Affidavit of Truth." In an effort to protect Plaintiff's rights, his filings were treated as an attempt to

12

open a civil rights case under Section 1983. On the same date the case was opened, the Clerk of the

13

Court sent Plaintiff a notice directing him to pay the filing fee or to file a completed in forma

14

pauperis (IFP) application. The Clerk also sent Plaintiff another notice directing him to file a

15

completed civil rights complaint form. Finally, the Clerk sent Plaintiff copies of the aforementioned

16

filings. However, Plaintiff did not respond to the two notices.

17
18
19

On July 7, 2011, the Clerk of the Court sent Plaintiff another notice directing him to file a
completed complaint form and a completed IFP application.
On July 13, 2011, the copies of his "Request for Entry of Default Judgment Pursuant to the

20

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure" and "Affidavit of Truth" were returned as undeliverable with a

21

notation: "Returned to Sender -- Refused," and an additional handwritten notation, "Inmate

22

Refused."

23
24
25

On July 15, 2011, the Clerk's July 7, 2011 notice was returned with a notation: "Returned to
Sender -- Refused."
On August 2, 2011, the Clerk re-sent the July 7, 2011 notice to Plaintiff. On August 12,

26

2011, the July 7, 2011 notice that was re-sent to Plaintiff was returned with a notation: "Returned to

27

Sender -- Refused."

28

In an Order dated September 16, 2011, the Court determined that because Plaintiff had

1

"failed to communicate with the Court since he filed this action" it was "in the interests of justice

2

and judicial efficiency . . . to establish whether Plaintiff intends to continue to prosecute this

3

action." (Sept. 16, 2011 Order at 2.) The Court directed Plaintiff to file a notice of his continued

4

intent to prosecute within thirty days. The Court informed him that the failure to do so would result

5

in the dismissal of this action without prejudice for failure to prosecute under Rule 41(b) of the

6

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Id. (citing Malone, 833 F.2d at 133 (the district court should

7

afford the litigant prior notice before dismissing for failure to prosecute).)

8
9

On September 20, 2011, the Clerk entered a filing submitted by Plaintiff entitled,
"Instrument of Clarification of the Private Legal Process."
It seems that Plaintiff's filing entered on September 20, 2011 was not filed in response to the

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

Court's September 16, 2011 Order to Show Cause; however, the Court assumes that Plaintiff intends

12

to prosecute this action. A review of Plaintiff's initial filings indicates that he fails to provide an

13

explanation of what claims he intends to press against the named Defendants. Nor does he allege

14

that he has exhausted his available administrative remedies. Therefore, the Court finds that Plaintiff

15

still must file a completed complaint form, as he was initially directed by the Clerk when his case

16

was opened.

17
18

To date, Plaintiff has not filed a completed complaint form nor has he paid the filing fee or
filed completed an IFP application form.

19

Within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order, Plaintiff must file a completed complaint

20

on the Court's form for prisoner Section 1983 cases. Plaintiff must link specific Defendants to his

21

claim by explaining what that Defendant did that caused a violation of Plaintiff's constitutional

22

rights. Leer v. Murphy, 844 F.2d 628, 634 (9th Cir. 1988) (liability may be imposed on an

23

individual defendant under section 1983 if the plaintiff can show that the defendant proximately

24

caused the deprivation of a federally protected right). If Plaintiff intends to sue a Defendant based

25

on supervisory liability, he must allege that the Defendant, as a supervisor, "participated in or

26

directed the violations, or knew of the violations and failed to act to prevent them." Taylor v. List,

27

880 F.2d 1040, 1045 (9th Cir. 1989). Plaintiff must also allege that he has exhausted his available

28

administrative remedies.
2

1

Furthermore, as mentioned above, Plaintiff has not yet paid the filing fee or filed a completed

2

IFP application form. Ordinarily, a plaintiff is permitted to file a civil action in federal court without

3

prepayment of fees or security if he makes affidavit that he is unable to pay such fees or give

4

security therefor. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). If the plaintiff is a prisoner who alleges that he is unable

5

to pay the full filing fee at the time of filing, he must submit: (1) an affidavit that includes a

6

statement of all assets he possesses, and (2) a certified copy of the trust fund account statement for

7

the prisoner for the six-month period immediately preceding the filing of the action, obtained from

8

the appropriate official of each prison at which the prisoner is or was confined. See id. § 1915(a)(1),

9

(2). If the court determines that the plaintiff is unable to pay the full filing fee at the time of filing,
the plaintiff will be granted leave to proceed IFP. This means that the filing fee must be paid by way

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

of an installment plan, according to which the court first will assess and collect a partial filing fee

12

from the prisoner, and then the prisoner will be required to make monthly payments of twenty

13

percent of the preceding month's income credited to the his account until the full $350.00 filing fee

14

is paid. Id. § 1915(b)(1). The agency having custody of the prisoner is responsible for forwarding

15

to the court payments from his account each time the amount in the account exceeds ten dollars. See

16

id.

17

Therefore, before this Court will proceed to review any future complaint form filed by

18

Plaintiff, he is hereby ORDERED to pay the $350.00 filing fee in full or to file a completed IFP

19

application using the enclosed form. He shall do so within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order.

20

Plaintiff must clearly write in the case number for this action, Case No. C 11-02668 SBA

21

(PR), on the completed complaint form and IFP application. Failure to (1) file a completed

22

complaint form and (2) pay the filing fee or submit a completed IFP application as ordered

23

herein by the thirty-day deadline shall result in the dismissal of this action without prejudice

24

under Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Clerk of the Court shall send

25

Plaintiff a blank civil rights complaint form as well as a prisoner IFP application along with a copy

26

of this Order.

27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED:

10/21/11
SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG

G:\PRO-SE\SBA\CR.11\Jordan2668.fileCOMPL&IFP.wpd

3

1
2
3
4

United States District Judge
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
IMHOTEP JORDAN JR,

5
6
7
8

Case Number: CV11-02668 SBA
Plaintiff,
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
v.
J CORONADO et al,
Defendant.

9

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13

/

I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District
Court, Northern District of California.
That on October 25, 2011, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said
copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said
envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle
located in the Clerk's office.

14
15

17

Imhotep Jordan C-71742
Calipatria State Prison
P.O. Box 5002
Calipatria, CA 92233

18

Dated: October 25, 2011

16

Richard W. Wieking, Clerk
By: LISA R CLARK, Deputy Clerk

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

G:\PRO-SE\SBA\CR.11\Jordan2668.fileCOMPL&IFP.wpd

4