Osram GmbH v. LG Electronics, Inc. et al
FINAL DECISION AND ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, ***Civil Case Terminated. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 11/14/12. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/14/2012)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case No. CV 11-02699 PJH
[PROPOSED] FINAL DECISION AND
ORDER PURSUANT TO
LG ELECTRONICS, INC., LG INNOTEK
CO., LTD., LG ELECTRONICS U.S.A., INC.,
and LG INNOTEK U.S.A., INC.
Pursuant to stipulation and joint motion of Plaintiff OSRAM GmbH and Defendants LG
Electronics, Inc., LG Innotek Co., Ltd., LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc., and LG Innotek U.S.A., Inc.
(collectively, “LG”), which includes the stipulation that this final decision should be entered, this
Court enters this final decision that LG has not sustained its burden of proving the invalidity of any
patent claim of U.S. Patent No. 7,151,283, U.S. Patent No. 7,629,621, U.S. Patent No. 7,126,162, or
U.S. Patent No. 6,812,500.
This action is dismissed with prejudice in its entirety. Each party is to pay its own costs and
attorneys’ fees. This decision is an Order of the Court which is final, enforceable, and not
IT IS SO ORDERED
Dated: November __, 2012
IT IS S
The Honorable Phyllis J. Hamilton
United States DistrictJ. Hamilton Judge
[PROPOSED] FINAL DECISION AND ORDER PURSUANT TO
D IS T IC T O
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?