Osram GmbH v. LG Electronics, Inc. et al

Filing 18

FINAL DECISION AND ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, ***Civil Case Terminated. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 11/14/12. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/14/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 OSRAM GMBH Case No. CV 11-02699 PJH Plaintiff, 8 9 10 11 [PROPOSED] FINAL DECISION AND ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION v. LG ELECTRONICS, INC., LG INNOTEK CO., LTD., LG ELECTRONICS U.S.A., INC., and LG INNOTEK U.S.A., INC. 12 Defendants. 13 14 Pursuant to stipulation and joint motion of Plaintiff OSRAM GmbH and Defendants LG 15 Electronics, Inc., LG Innotek Co., Ltd., LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc., and LG Innotek U.S.A., Inc. 16 (collectively, “LG”), which includes the stipulation that this final decision should be entered, this 17 Court enters this final decision that LG has not sustained its burden of proving the invalidity of any 18 patent claim of U.S. Patent No. 7,151,283, U.S. Patent No. 7,629,621, U.S. Patent No. 7,126,162, or 19 U.S. Patent No. 6,812,500. 20 This action is dismissed with prejudice in its entirety. Each party is to pay its own costs and 21 attorneys’ fees. This decision is an Order of the Court which is final, enforceable, and not 22 appealable. 23 IT IS SO ORDERED 25 14 Dated: November __, 2012 By: ERED O ORD IT IS S R NIA The Honorable Phyllis J. Hamilton United States DistrictJ. Hamilton Judge hyllis Court Judge P [PROPOSED] FINAL DECISION AND ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION A H ER LI RT 28 FO NO 27 UNIT ED 26 S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O S 24 N F D IS T IC T O R C 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?