Mitchell v. Duffy
Filing
29
ORDER re 26 MOTION for Order to Show Cause filed by Paul Mitchell. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 1/23/12. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/25/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
No. C 11-02705 SBA (PR)
PAUL MITCHELL,
Petitioner,
v.
ANTHONY HEDGEPETH, Warden,
Respondent.
15
/
ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER'S
SECOND REQUEST FOR EXTENSION
OF TIME TO FILE HIS OPPOSITION
TO MOTION TO DISMISS; AND
DIRECTING RESPONDENT TO FILE
RESPONSE TO PETITIONER'S OTHER
PENDING MOTION
16
17
18
Petitioner has filed a second request for an extension of time in which to file his opposition
to Respondent's Motion to Dismiss.
19
On November 18, 2011, the Court granted Petitioner's first request for an extension of time
20
to file his opposition. The Court directed Petitioner to file his opposition no later than January 12,
21
2012. Petitioner now requests a second extension of time, stating that lockdowns at the prison have
22
prevented his access to the law library. Having read and considered Petitioner's request, and good
23
cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner's request for an extension of time is
24
GRANTED. The time in which Petitioner may file his opposition to Respondent's Motion to
25
Dismiss will be extended up to and including thirty (30) days from the date of this Order.
26
27
28
Respondent shall file a reply brief no later than fifteen (15) days after the date Petitioner's
opposition is filed.
1
Petitioner has also filed a document entitled, "Order to Show Cause for an [sic] Preliminary
2
Injuction" (docket no. 26), in which he requests sufficient access to the prison law library and
3
complains of "limitations that are too restrictive and constitute a denial of [his] rights to access [to]
4
the courts." (Pl.'s Dec. 27, 2011 Mot. at 1.) The Court construes this document as a motion for an
5
order directing the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) to allow him
6
physical access to the Salinas Valley State Prison (SVSP) law library. Respondent has not
7
responded to Petitioner's motion. Therefore, no later than ten (10) days from the date of this Order,
8
the Court directs Respondent to respond to Petitioner's motion for an order allowing him access to
9
the SVSP law library.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
DATED: 1/23/12
SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
G:\PRO-SE\SBA\HC.11\Mitchell2705.2ndEOT&LIBaccess.frm
2
1
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
4
5
PAUL MITCHELL,
Case Number: CV11-02705 SBA
6
7
8
9
Plaintiff,
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
v.
ANTHONY HEDGEPETH et al,
Defendant.
/
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District
Court, Northern District of California.
That on January 25, 2012, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said
copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said
envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle located
in the Clerk's office.
15
16
18
Paul Mitchell G-21965
Salinas Valley State Prison
31625 Highway 101
P.O. Box 1050
Soledad, CA 93960-1050
19
Dated: January 25, 2012
17
Richard W. Wieking, Clerk
By: LISA R CLARK, Deputy Clerk
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
G:\PRO-SE\SBA\HC.11\Mitchell2705.2ndEOT&LIBaccess.frm
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?