Jackson v. Fischer et al

Filing 107

ORDER. Signed by Judge Hamilton on 5/21/2012. (pjhlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/21/2012)

1
2
3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

5
6
7

SUZANNE D. JACKSON,
Plaintiff,

8
9

v.

ORDER

WILLIAM FISCHER, et al.,

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

No. C 11-2753 PJH

Defendants.
_______________________________/

12
13

In view of defendants’ failure to file replies to plaintiff’s opposition to their motions to

14

dismiss, and in view of the apparent agreement of all defendants except one to the filing of

15

a second amended complaint, the court is inclined to approve the filing of the second

16

amended complaint and also to terminate the pending motions to dismiss. Any party that

17

wishes to object to this procedure shall file a response, no later than Friday, May 25, 2012.

18

If the court receives no objections, plaintiff shall file the second amended complaint, no

19

later than June 15, 2012. Any motions to dismiss shall be filed within 21 days of the date of

20

filing of the second amended complaint.

21
22

The date for the hearing on the pending motions to dismiss, previously set for June
6, 2012, is VACATED.

23
24

IT IS SO ORDERED.

25

Dated: May 21, 2012

26
27
28

______________________________
PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON
United States District Judge