Jackson v. Fischer et al
Filing
107
ORDER. Signed by Judge Hamilton on 5/21/2012. (pjhlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/21/2012)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
6
7
SUZANNE D. JACKSON,
Plaintiff,
8
9
v.
ORDER
WILLIAM FISCHER, et al.,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
No. C 11-2753 PJH
Defendants.
_______________________________/
12
13
In view of defendants’ failure to file replies to plaintiff’s opposition to their motions to
14
dismiss, and in view of the apparent agreement of all defendants except one to the filing of
15
a second amended complaint, the court is inclined to approve the filing of the second
16
amended complaint and also to terminate the pending motions to dismiss. Any party that
17
wishes to object to this procedure shall file a response, no later than Friday, May 25, 2012.
18
If the court receives no objections, plaintiff shall file the second amended complaint, no
19
later than June 15, 2012. Any motions to dismiss shall be filed within 21 days of the date of
20
filing of the second amended complaint.
21
22
The date for the hearing on the pending motions to dismiss, previously set for June
6, 2012, is VACATED.
23
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
Dated: May 21, 2012
26
27
28
______________________________
PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?