A.F. Rothschild Fund v. Department of Health and Human Services et al

Filing 19

ORDER DENYING EXTENSION. Signed by Judge Beeler on 8/19/2011. (lblc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/19/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 Northern District of California 10 Oakland Division A F ROTHSCHILD FUND, 12 For the Northern District of California UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 No. C 11-02760 LB Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING EXTENSION v. [ECF No. 18] 13 14 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, et al., 15 Defendant. _____________________________________/ 16 17 On August 12, 2011, the parties filed a stipulation to extend Plaintiff’s time to respond to 18 Defendants’ motion to dismiss from August 19, 2011 to September 26, 2011. ECF No. 18 at 2. As 19 the parties acknowledge, this schedule does not comport with the current Civil Local Rules, which 20 fix the deadlines for filing opposition and reply briefs. (It also does not comport with the old rules 21 regarding the 35-day filing deadlines for motions.) The court does not find good cause for a 28-day 22 extension and, accordingly, DENIES the parties’ requested extension. N.D. Cal. L.R. 6-2(b) (“After 23 receiving a stipulated request under this Rule, the Judge may grant, deny or modify the requested 24 time change.”). However, the court EXTENDS Plaintiff’s time to file an opposition to September 6, 25 2011. Defendants’ optional reply is due September 13, 2011. 26 27 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 19, 2011 _______________________________ LAUREL BEELER United States Magistrate Judge 28 C 11-02760 LB ORDER DENYING EXTENSION

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?